Yes - thats what i mean - its impossible to distinguish individually. I might look at that ART and say - "wow, thats real good porno bro!" - but you would say, "No UKMan - thats ART!".Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@9 November 2003 - 00:58
That I agree with, it's never art to show pictures of youngsters unclothed, nor to take pictures like that.nudism can get away with showing f***ing disgusting pics of their kids on the beach and then arguing that its ART
But I guess what it really comes down to in the end is if a picture of a man/woman is taken to please others and cause sexual arousment (like Titey Said) it could be classed as porn, whereas a tastful pose could be considered art, so with my pics they were taken to please others (stfu Titey, they were pleased ) they were designed to arouse and be kept hidden (stfu up Titey, that was'nt my fault ) but if they were taken to be hung on a wall in a house then they would be art...............right
Ok now I'm confused
Jonno B)
Peace
UKMan
Bookmarks