Yes - thats what i mean - its impossible to distinguish individually. I might look at that ART and say - "wow, thats real good porno bro!" - but you would say, "No UKMan - thats ART!".Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@9 November 2003 - 00:58
That I agree with, it's never art to show pictures of youngsters unclothed, nor to take pictures like that.nudism can get away with showing f***ing disgusting pics of their kids on the beach and then arguing that its ART
But I guess what it really comes down to in the end is if a picture of a man/woman is taken to please others and cause sexual arousment (like Titey Said) it could be classed as porn, whereas a tastful pose could be considered art, so with my pics they were taken to please others (stfu Titey, they were pleased) they were designed to arouse and be kept hidden (stfu up Titey, that was'nt my fault
) but if they were taken to be hung on a wall in a house then they would be art...............right
![]()
Ok now I'm confused![]()
Jonno B)
Peace
UKMan
Bookmarks