Ok Serious Question

**JONNO_CELEBS** · 11-08-2003, 09:23 PM

What is classed as Pornographic pictures?

As some of you know I have various pictures of myself as several members have.
So what is pornographic?

A nude picture?
A Nude Pose?

For Male......If the penis is not errect is it classed as pornographic?

I know of the T.V. "Mull of Kintire" Rule (look at pic)

So this is acceptable for tv after 7pm, and newspapers, magazines etc and does not need to carry a certification.

As for women, I am not sure the rules on this.
The Female form taken from a frontal shot is used in Schools for education as is the male form providing it adheirs to the "Mull" rule.

So..............Does a full frontal shot of a female or a male (non errect) depict "Porn"?? If there is no sexual act being performed in the picture??

You may now congratulate me for being so serious when talking about sex

Jonno B)

**titey** · 11-08-2003, 09:32 PM

CONGRATULATIONS!

Ya perverted pillock.

**DarthInsinuate** · 11-08-2003, 09:37 PM

i find any picture with a woman in it pornographic

**Nightwolf** · 11-08-2003, 10:01 PM

Originally posted by DarthInsinuate@8 November 2003 - 16:37
i find any picture with a woman in it pornographic

Well said. And anything involving a naked man, erect or not, is just disgusting (unless he's with a naked chick).

**JONNO_CELEBS** · 11-08-2003, 10:15 PM

@Titey........typical, you're away for weeks and when you do come back you just happen to catch me trying to be serious

I want serious answers, I'm genuanly interested

Jonno B)

**titey** · 11-08-2003, 10:30 PM

Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@8 November 2003 - 17:15
I want serious answers, I'm genuanly interested

Jonno B)

Oh, sorry m8.... it's just so out of character for you to be genuinely serious.

A wee bit unnerving as well.

Ok then....

por-nog-ra-phy

the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement
material (as books or a photograph) that depicts erotic behavior and is intended to cause sexual excitement
the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction

Seems to me then, that whether an image is pornographic or not depends on the intention of the person displaying it.

Is that better?

**JONNO_CELEBS** · 11-08-2003, 10:41 PM

Ok this is very scary cos me and Titey are about to be serious

Right.........

to cause sexual excitement

Surly that is down to the person viewing them, for instance, when I was 14 I could'nt look at a nude female without giggling and having to nip to the bog for 10 mins, but now I can look without giggling

Nah, it is down to who views it, like I said a naked Man/Woman stood in a full frontal pose is not nessesarrily(<<never ould spell that word......Nikki?) sexual, there is at least 1 pic of me where I just stood there.......

that depicts erotic behavior

So if the subject is nude but not involved in a sexual act it's ok?

And you say about the intention?...........Surly it's more about the way it is inturprated?

Ok need to go somewhere to be silly

Jonno B)

**titey** · 11-08-2003, 10:52 PM

Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS+8 November 2003 - 17:41--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (JONNO_CELEBS @ 8 November 2003 - 17:41)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Ok this is very scary cos me and Titey are about to be serious

Jonno B)[/b]

I wish you woulda phrased that differently.

<!--QuoteBegin-JONNO_CELEBS@8 November 2003 - 17:41
And you say about the intention?...........Surly it's more about the way it is inturprated?

Jonno B)[/quote]

Well, according to the dictionary definitions I quoted, I'd have to say it is determined by intention.

Whether or not the viewer is aroused or disgusted is moot, since people react to images differently.

**JONNO_CELEBS** · 11-08-2003, 10:58 PM

So..........in that respect, is a picture , full frontal of a person who is simply standing still arms by side Pornographic?

See, I knew no one would be able to answer this

Jonno B)