Many many curry groups do not have "scripts". That's the whole point of having curry groups with many members, in case you didn't know. Otherwise topsites can race amongst one another without problems. They may have a script for the "to" end of the race, but they don't really want to linkback between the different sites. Moreover, curry groups race amongst themselves, any variation is simply annihilated based on the fact that the person with the most adept (read: fat) pipe is going to win in the end. When you have groups that do their shit right, that turns the race into an almost robotic deed.
Limiting factors are overcome all the time. Some sites in the torrent world even beat actual topsites for some races, that's how limited everything is. However, to reach the assumption that the entire scene-p2p leak is actually ONE site is rather humiliating, to be honest. How come some sites are still racing full throttle today? How come whenever topsite busts happened in the past for sites like SCC/ScT/TL none of the others were affected? You realize that even within sites like SCC itself many members upload using their own access, and the different uploaders have different responsibilities depending on what their access specializes in? At the very least acknowledge that very few people in the scene are scene only nowadays, because put simply, it's rather easy proving how many "famous" groups actually have p2p influence. This isn't the first (is it even?) p2p site bust, and it won't be the last because there's more out there.
I actually had a much longer response typed out but I'll shorten it to: Please don't revel in your own ignorance, you seem reasonable enough, and for you to reach an assumption such as this is a true testament to what BT makes of the intelligent mind.
Bookmarks