Is there a review besides the one year old to this tracker ?? I want to apply but first i want to know a little bit more about it.
Is there a review besides the one year old to this tracker ?? I want to apply but first i want to know a little bit more about it.
It's one of the very best dedicated HD trackers around. Their internal group is the most active HD group out there these days, releasing a number of encodes, remuxes and full Blu-rays every day, often the first to do so, beating the traditional scene more often than not, too.
All internal releases are 50% or even full free leech. Speeds are excellent on new releases, and retention is very good also (especially when it comes to internal releases), although speeds can vary on older releases depening on your whereabouts.
No "the problem" is that it's just silly and he felt like saying so.
As for the rest of the questionable questionnaire why even bother asking for movie preferences ( or if you even watch what you download for that matter ) ,your age ( unlikely anyone truly mature is going to be running a seedbox on a bt tracker ) and the like when obviously it makes not one whit of difference in the outcome ?
Like you astutely noted "they " aren't looking for "normal" users in this "open " application anyway .. normal presumably being someone who just likes movies and wants to actually watch what they download( 1Tb )-not make a occupation of it - ridiculous things like that ) .
Btw I do realize that they just stole the gist of the application frommore saneother places before you regale me with a counter argument.
One last thing
Last edited by IdolEyes787; 04-05-2011 at 12:24 PM.
Respect my lack of authority.
Well, I just don't see the problem for the simple fact that they actually give users an opportunity to join (while many other 'rare' trackers don't). You may not like their criteria, but nobody forces you to accept them right? Nobody forces you to join the tracker either. It's their tracker, their rules.
CHDBits has over 30,000 users, the tracker is very active and they don't need an influx of new users to 'revive' it, far from it. What they do need / want is seedboxes to help spreading their releases faster. This is an opportunity for those users, or other users who meet the high bandwidth criteria (theoretically, 3.5-4Mbit/s upstream bandwidth is enough to upload 1TB in a month if seeding 24/7 - difficult, but not impossible to achieve without a seedbox, depending on your connection). I can't see what's wrong with that. Should they just keep their doors shut instead?
Why not ask for new members that seed their files for months/years/ever ... and make that a critical aspect of the recruiting process.
From what I've heard CHDBits has good, to excellent speeds on new releases, but on the older releases they sometimes lack speed and retention.
So they don't need more users picking up everything with their seedboxes, and seeding 2 days and thus deleting their files.
Anyone can rent a GBIT-seedbox for 1 month and upload multiple TB the first month and than get rid of the seedbox
Can you feel the LOVE
That's actually an argument that makes sense.
Still, seeding HD content over a long period of time is probably an even more demanding criteria than the bandwidth one. Very few users actually do that (-> space necessary), and how are you going to verify that? Just add an user and wait a year to see how he has done?
i think its the end of this tracker , they want make money as fast as they can then run run...
Vectoral FTW!
they limit their upload bandwidth on new releases anyway so seedboxes are pointless. On my home connection I can seed almost 200GB for a full BD because it is seeding for 3 days before it even finishes
CHD should only really be joined if you want to download full BD sources or Chinese TV shows
Bookmarks