I started off using Itunes then switched to mediamonkey and then to winamp and now back to mediamonkey. Just wondering what your preference is? I think mediamonkey is the best for me because I like to browse by location and such. Winamp was pretty good but just kind of annoying. Itunes is just a complete headache and pain in the ass.
.
I use Winamp 2.95. It works and uses very little resources.
"I just remembered something that happened a long time ago."
BT Rep: +15
foobar2k or winamp
Last edited by yevgeny; 05-27-2011 at 09:06 PM.
Über User
BT Rep: +25
Winamp
“Just because you’re miserable doesn’t mean you can’t enjoy your life.”
DO NOT RANDOMLY PM ME ASKING FOR INVITES!
Poster
Foobar2000.
winamp all the way
¡¡ ƃɯo ƃɯo ƃɯo
BT Rep: +7
Foobar, nothing can beat it if you know how to configure it properly.
winamp is second best (if you ignore the irritating UI)
Poster
BT Rep: +45
I thought i was the only one using that versionOriginally Posted by anon-sbi
It's very very fast even on old hardware but i recently changed to foobar for the reason that it doesn't need additional plugins for flac and it shows the cover of the song .
Is there a way to show the cover with winamp classic ?
I prefer iTunes. On Mac side anyway. It isn't as great on Windows, but eh. That is the price you pay for owning a subpar Windows machine.
Winamp dude
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks