It won't happen to many big corporations and governments profit and benefit from prohibition example alcohol industry, tobacco, big pharmaceutical, corrections, police, etc...
It won't happen to many big corporations and governments profit and benefit from prohibition example alcohol industry, tobacco, big pharmaceutical, corrections, police, etc...
FST Crew
BT Rep: +1
Slim to none of it getting overthrown or being passed? Pretty sure Obama's views on Cannabis legalisation is pretty bad. If he does change views it could change his political persona in a negative way. Labor here (rightfully so) have a negative persona for bending over backwards against the Unions.Originally Posted by stlcardinal9
Chances are slim to none, the president can veto a bill only if it doesnt get a super majority vote in the house and senate, which means it would have to get 75% support in the house and the senate. To answer your question a bill/law can pass the U.S. house of representatives 435 members and the Senate 100 members but could be vetoed by the President 1 member!
If the bill is indeed passed, I guess it's only a mater of time before neighbouring countries adopt. I never thought I would say this but; the possibilities on the tax made are endless. A logical way to get out of a deficit without giving dole bludgers $900 of tax payers money.
How would it? You douche bags have done it yourselfDO NOT DO IT!It would ruin the flow of US tourist into the Netherlands!
http://www.smh.com.au/travel/travel-...530-1fblu.html
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music"
The Lonely Wanderer
Read up, Marlboro would love this, since they own the patent for Mary Jane cigs
[center]
m@D @n!m3
BT Rep: +1
Obama wanted to legalize it as well before congress shut him down.
Alamo Drafthouse!
Last Game Completed: Aliens: Colonial Marines (PC) 10-13-13
Now Playing: Paper Mario 64
Total Games Completed: 503
FST Crew
BT Rep: +1
I thought he said he wasn't in favour:
He wants to see drugs as a health problem (instead of criminal) though, which is fair coming from a diplomatic perspective.As I said before, I'm not in the U.S. so don't really hear a lot about the trivial things that happen over there. Has his perspective changed?
Last edited by iLOVENZB; 06-24-2011 at 04:56 AM.
m@D @n!m3
BT Rep: +1
i'm not looking for any article, but he clearly wanted to legalize it for the sole purpose of boosting the economy. UPDATE on this thread: Bipartisan Legislation
Last edited by mr. nails; 06-24-2011 at 05:31 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
. 
As I said before, I'm not in the U.S. so don't really hear a lot about the trivial things that happen over there. Has his perspective changed? 
Bookmarks