Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: List of Usenet Clients that support fill-servers

  1. #1
    newsgroupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,037

    Urgent

    Due to the completion problems that exist with Astraweb at this moment (as well as every major service provider to varying degrees) setting up a block account as a secondary "fill" server to automatically catch the primary server's missing parts has become a necessity. But sadly, most newsreaders and NZB clients with multi-server capability DO NOT support a fill-server arrangement.

    So I thought I'd put together a list of usenet clients with fill-server capability:


    Free Software:

    Altbinz v0.25
    Binary News Reaper (BNR2/BNR3)
    Ninan
    NNTPGrab
    NZB-O-Matic
    SABnzbd


    Comercial Software:

    Newsbin v6 (v5 splits bandwidth between servers)
    Newsleecher
    Newsreactor
    Usenet Explorer
    (possibly others)


    Linux

    HellaNZB
    Pan
    URD? (will confirm later)


    Fill-server support may not always be apparent, as some newsreaders may - without indicating it in any way - automatically try every server in the list whenever the first server has a missing article. (NZB-O-Matic works this way)

    Conversely, many others that support multiple servers typically do not allow combining servers sequencially on the same article if the first server comes up short. (Grabit comes to mind regarding this 'non-feature').

    I think I've probably covered all the free software, but I'm open to any suggestions/corrections.
    Last edited by zot; 07-06-2011 at 07:18 AM. Reason: separated Linux clients

  2. Newsgroups   -   #2
    zot where do u set fill server in Usenet explorer?
    Is it "preference" for a server in servers window?

  3. Newsgroups   -   #3
    newsgroupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,037
    Yes, UE calls its server priority setting "preference" - just as every client, it seems, has its own unique name for it

  4. Newsgroups   -   #4
    Funkin''s Avatar home skillet BT Rep: +4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,344
    Is Hella still abandoned?

  5. Newsgroups   -   #5
    Poster
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    201
    It is nice to see Newsbin got there shit together for this type of setup. They always had it really ass backwards and made it seem like there way was the best.

  6. Newsgroups   -   #6
    Thanks for the list ! I've tried NNTPGrab from the free software list and Newsbin from the commercial . I'll write a review about it, soon

  7. Newsgroups   -   #7
    Hella is abandoned

  8. Newsgroups   -   #8
    Funkin''s Avatar home skillet BT Rep: +4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,344
    ^ That's too bad. I was hoping somebody else would pick it up. This was my favorite client for quite a while. I really liked having using a client from Terminal. It was super light.

    Any other clients similar to Hella?

  9. Newsgroups   -   #9
    newsgroupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,037
    Quote Originally Posted by sapa50 View Post
    Hella is abandoned
    Free, open-source projects can never really get "abandoned" - they can only go dormant.

    I've never understood people's obsession with software release dates. To me, if a program does everything I need it to do, then it makes absolutely no difference how old it might be. (and in many cases, older versions of software can be outright superior)

    Although NNTP is an ancient format, there have been a few advances in binary usenet clients in recent years. These include features such as:

    NZBs
    SSL
    RSS
    multi-connections
    auto-Rar/auto-Par
    fill servers
    streaming media player
    compressed headers
    memory caching
    (future feature) download headers using multiple connections

    Some of these features can be performed by installing additional software, such as using Stunnel for SSL and compression.

    I'd probably have to say that support for NZBs and multiple connections forms the basis of all modern binary clients. But other than that, I would have to rate fill-server support as the most necessary feature, since it can make all the difference between getting a file ... or not getting a file.


    Quote Originally Posted by Funkin' View Post
    ^ That's too bad. I was hoping somebody else would pick it up. This was my favorite client for quite a while. I really liked having using a client from Terminal. It was super light.

    Any other clients similar to Hella?

    Thanks for reminding me.

    There is also Nget, an open-source, command-line Linux client. Nget also supports fill-servers -- but not multi-thread downloading.

    Like Hellanzb, Nget could probably be classified as dormant (or even "abandoned") - but like I said earlier, if a software release does everything you need it to do, what difference does it make when it was released?
    Last edited by zot; 07-21-2011 at 04:42 PM.

  10. Newsgroups   -   #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Funkin' View Post
    ^ That's too bad. I was hoping somebody else would pick it up. This was my favorite client for quite a while. I really liked having using a client from Terminal. It was super light.

    Any other clients similar to Hella?
    NZBGet.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •