![Quote](https://i.filesharingtalk.com/misc_fst/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Mrs.Benchez
As far as I understand it, there are a couple of reasons. Firstly, they are appreciating the benifits of education and far more Travellers these days want to keep their children in school, they therefore need to stay in one place to allow continuity at the same school. Having started to live in one place, they obviously build up relationships and a community which becomes hard to leave. Secondly, even if they wanted to keep travelling about, there are no longer the facilities for them on the roadside - there are very few sites where they can legally stay, and verges are often obstructed intentionally by the council, or simply not wide enough to accomodate caravans. The Dale Farm situation has highlighted how few legal Traveller sites there are with spaces - it looks like there aren't actually enough spaces available (certainly in the local counties) for the residents, once evicted, to move to. Another point is the type of accomodation they live in - I can understand why people think they should just move into brick houses as they're obviously not on the move any more, but there is something in their culture, you could say in their blood, that means they feel claustrophobic in a permanent building. I don't know much about it (I've spoken to a few Gypsies) but maybe it's the knowledge that they can move if they need to (and considering their past as well as contemporary prejudices it's something they often have to do, and may feel trapped without). As far as the council's position on Dale Farm is concerned, they are flouting the recommendations of the UN and Amnestry International, and hanging it all on the fact that it's a greenbelt site. It's a fucking scrap yard. And did you know that construction companies no longer have to prioritise building on brownfield sites over green belt?! It's a fucking disgrace - one law for huge corporate bodies and another for the ethnic minority.
Bookmarks