By your logic, chavis must be more popular than Friendly McLotsofmates, like.
By your logic, chavis must be more popular than Friendly McLotsofmates, like.
As long as I've got a face
You've got a place to sit
What a weird line of thought. My 'conclusion' was based upon the discussion you're having with him on this very thread. Again I'm not sure why I'm meant to give any kind of fuck what you think about me. I do however reserve the right to make statements about what I see in you, in resonse to you making statements about what you see in me.
I wonder what it is about chavis that makes people behave as they do towards him? You know like you just did.
1) There you are having a nice matey chat with him, about past events and about things that have passed between you in the past.
2) He makes a remark about me, and I respond.
3) You join in and take a swipe at me.
4) I point out that you're just another mate of chavis.
5) You deny it.
Why do people deny it? Is it that shameful? Or at least thought of as something you don't want to be? Cause that's how it comes across. Oh! And you're not the first member who has denied it.
Jebus. I think it's time you took the rage-tinted spectacles off. That post was quite ridiculous.
Bo merely pointed out that your conclusion that he's chavis' mate using the logic that you did was quite a leap. He didn't type that he isn't chavis' mate, probably cus he is.
Absence of affirmation does not constitute denial.
I think you're getting mixed up so I'll attempt to clarify; people are taking swipes at you not because of any allegiance to chavis, but because of the words you type.
Last edited by Alien5; 11-22-2011 at 05:21 PM.
No I think you missed the point entirely.
More than one member here as responded to a post of mine pointing out that they're a mate of chavis, by immediately responding defensively.
Now what is this logic which you claimed I used to leap to an unfounded conclusion?
I stated what I did because the posts they made prove the conclusion I posted. The response to that conclusion was defensive, and negative.
As for people taking swipes at me, as I keep pointing out, I couldn't care less. I never came here to make friends, I came here to return to chavis that which he so willing dishes out to others. I don't care if any of you like me, I don't care what any of you think about my opinions about anything, I don't care if any of you like or dislike my posts.
Yeah.
The defensive reaction is precisely because they're taking a swipe because you posted some words and not because they're chavis' mate because the implication in your post(s) is that Bo (or whoever) would only take a swipe at you to suck up to chavis, which is obviously going to elicit a defensive response when it isn't the case.
You just said that your point was that people responded defensively - which is true, they do. You also made the point that people, in this case Bo, denied being his mate. Which is false (certainly in this case). It was number 5 in your list of points.
I disputed this.
So far from me missing that point. I read it, comprehended it, and successfully rebutted it.
Bo didn't deny he was chavis' mate.
I also wanted to help you understand why the swiping happens, hence the extra words.
Fuck's sake. explaining stuff in detail is such a chore. Was my original post really so impenetrable![]()
Bookmarks