
Originally Posted by
Squeamous
I'll go for a natural style of written discourse every time, and assume that as long as I am understood then the desired outcome of language has been achieved if not perfect execution.
But you ended up making your point ambiguous as a result, it could have gone (could still go) either way, and that's the only reason I pointed it out. It's OK not to be perfect, there can be only one mjmacky.
Bookmarks