Sheds.

[manker]

If I didn't have to worry about your emotional needs or give you any practical support, it would leave me with more time for x-bawks, wanking and inner contemplation. I can see how that would lead to me turning into the description of your ex but it's tempting

I was thinking perhaps if both parties in a relationship could manage their own shit efficiently it might leave time for this:



But then I'm just a girl what do I know

Seems like too much sex and not enough telly. I mean, fuck, is that all in the same day.

If only there was some kind of device which would enable a sexually voracious female to satisfy herself while her emasculated partner posts pish on the internets.
Should I ever have the wherewithal to invent one, I'll call it Orgasmatron

[Squeamous]

Seems like too much sex and not enough telly. I mean, fuck, is that all in the same day.

If only there was some kind of device which would enable a sexually voracious female to satisfy herself while her emasculated partner posts pish on the internets.
Should I ever have the wherewithal to invent one, I'll call it Orgasmatron

Isn't that just another name for Mouldy, the bored fluffer?

[Barbarossa]

Orgasmatron is a type of head massager. True story.

[Squeamous]

I used to have one. Made me purr like a spastic cat that needed spaying.

[Barbarossa]

You may have been doing it wrong

[Squeamous]

Everyone else is doing it wrong.

[Funkin']

That assumes a shed is a cold and/or dirty place.

True. But my point still stands. It's much easier for me to simply point to the door when I want her to leave instead of me getting up from my comfy spot.

And I totally agree with the honesty thing, it's definitely one of the better ways to get left alone for a while. When I tell my girl what I really think about her weight when she asks that usually buys me at least a couple days free of her.

[NotLettingItGo]

Fail.

It never ceases to amuse me to see blokes denying what deep down inside they know is true... keep it up old chap.

As usual, our damaged pal has ventured deep into the realm of hyperbole - but once his exaltations are tempered, you'll see that he is absolutely correct.

Does my arse look big in this?
Do you fancy me as much as you used to?
Do you think my sister is sexually attractive?
You'd feel so bad if you had an affair that you'd tell me, right?
Do you prefer going out with me or your mates?
Am I the dirtiest slut you've ever pissed on?
Are you excited about waking up with me on xmas morning?

If I answered any one of those questions honestly, then she'd fuck off into the far distance and I'd be left alone in my wankpit for at least an hour. She'd then text me and ask if I really meant it - and only dishonesty would would stop the heartache.

I'm not saying that this is a bad thing. It's just how it is with wiminz.

You speak about me being damaged by my latest experience as if it's a bad thing, but it's not. The damage caused grants me the ability to reflect and consider my interactions with the women I've known throughout my life. It's from that reflection that I come to realise how stupid I've been in relation to the specific friendship with that specific woman, and indeed how stupid I've been not to see what women are over the period of my life when I've wandered around giving a fuck about them and what they think and feel. It's been a learning experience, one that has opened my eyes to the true nature of women.

I only deal in terms of honesty, often earning me the label of insensitive. However, you seem to have a bigger problem with their response to honesty than they have a problem with the truth. Feeling like shit over a revelation of an unpleasant truth would be an honest response. So basically, what exactly is your problem again?

If you just can't stand a woman getting uppity, than harness your pivot and back swing, it's the closest thing to respect you'll probably ever experience.

We've covered this before, I'm never going to hit a woman. You might be OK with behaving that way towards them, I'm not. I have recognised though that my position isn't necessarily the right one, and that my lifelong automatic condemnation of men who believe and behave as you do has been wrong. It doesn't change what I am though, and I just won't do that. I don't need the respect of any woman who behaves badly enough to make me want to hit her.

What in the name of tarnation does that mean

He means that I should get respect by hitting women who hurt me. It's something he believes is OK, and something I don't.

This has been an interesting thread, starting out on sheds, and converting into the love or logic continuation thread.

We've had the denialists coming in with their Fail comments about my statement about women all being basically dishonest. Which I find particularly interesting, because I know that deep down they know I'm dead on the mark about that, but they won't admit it to themselves.

We've has the raising of that specific woman again, her damage to me, and my hyperbole... interestingly contrasted with an acceptance that my hyperbole is correct. This thread has caused me a great deal of hope for manker, I think he might actually be saveable

We've had an admission from a female member that she very much lives upto what I have been saying for months about women, that men are only a source of 'happiness' to her and that when they cease to be that, they're got rid of with fuck all regard for them.

Sorry I wasn't around to join in today, I had to go and have my APR, and so got to enjoy the company of a woman I know for a couple of hours this morning before the pointless meeting about what a wonderful chap I am... as if there was any doubt.

[megabyteme]

It never ceases to amuse me to see blokes denying what deep down inside they know is true... keep it up old chap.

As usual, our damaged pal has ventured deep into the realm of hyperbole - but once his exaltations are tempered, you'll see that he is absolutely correct.

You see, Rej, the problem I have with taking your words at any kind of value is that you have grown to hate women. The same comments made by Manker, or myself, as I agree with him, are FAR easier to accept because we both love them, and have found women to be positives in our lives. You are stuck on the same kind of spewing that any other kind of hate group emits. Are there faults? Yes (Men are known to have some, too). Should we go around making asses out of ourselves spewing hatred for half the world's population? Most intelligent people would think not.

You were expecting more than you got. Simple story. Most of us learn that life lesson on Christmas morning around the age of 7. Welcome to the club.

[manker]

Annual parole review is the only thing that makes any kind of sense there.
An annual performance review would require some kind of job, thus making the apology for not being around redundant. Or maybe you work from home?

In related news, I was merely saying how men were of dishonest in their dealings with wiminz. Rather than highlighting women's dishonesty.
However, they're equally adept at white lies. They want to protect our egos, which is quite sweet when you think about it.

For instance, all girlfriends and especially wives know that they must only ever be completely complimentary about cawk size or performance in bed. 100% of the time. Always.
They won't ever tell you about the hawt guy in work - but they'll wax lyrical about some 15 year old in Glee. This is because they know you'll be able to rationalise their lust for someone unobtainable but will have a gigantic strop about the debonair IT guy.
When looking at a gigantic cawk in porn, she won't start salivating, she'll tell you that it's 'too big' and 'would hurt'.
After stalling at the lights, she'll nod sagely at your mumbled 'manufacturer's defect' excuse instead of pointing and laughing.

I suppose what I'm saying is that it's fine. The whole thing just works a little bit better if you're not autistically honest about everything.