Unethical fuckwits...

[NotLettingItGo]

Quoted for posterity because you're a delusional fuckwit.

The only time she's even acknowledged your presence at fst is in this thread earlier today to call you a sad old man.
Unless I've missed the cavalcade of digs you refer to. Which is particularly unlikely because you've made them up.

Oh! manker, you really must see someone about this reading and comprehension problem you have.
https://filesharingtalk.com/threads/4...=1#post3621727

To which I sent this perfectly reasonable PM:

It's really... not very difficult. You stay completely away from me, and I stay completely away from you.

https://filesharingtalk.com/threads/4...=1#post3621727

Her response was to take a much more subtle line taking digs at me, but they're still digs and they're all there for you to go look out for yourself.

The point of proof is moot, however. The pertinent matter is that you've been told that if you go to her place again, she will inform the police.
Absolute proof of your unbalanced mind isn't necessary for two uniforms to pop around to your house and give you a friendly warning to back off. The police often do this because it frequently sorts out problems pre-emptively.

I imagine that your wife and children will be perturbed by their visit.
My point is that if you refrain from going around there again, you won't get reported and don't have to run the risk of your family's opinion of you sinking even lower.

Can you understand how it is better to definitely avoid this scenario by staying the fuck away than run the risk of it occurring.

So your considered opinion is that I should just accept this woman behaving as she is towards me, because if it is, I'm going to have to disappoint you. I'd have thought it should be obvious that by choosing to act like a complete cunt towards me, she has absolutely no grounds for complaining about me behaving like a complete cunt towards her in return.

The threat of the Police is a novel one, I was expecting the threat of her having a couple of heavies come visit me, she and the people she hangs out with have a history of that kind of behaviour. So that was far more what I was expecting, but the Police is good with me if she wants to go that way. I can just see the opportunity to lodge a formal complaint for malicious accusations, and if I'm really lucky a visit before a magistrate where she can explain why she choose to treat me as she has to them. I'm OK with either option though so she can choose.

Next time you all want to go off accusing someone of stalking, you might just like to consider that you could not know half the fuck what you think you do, and reconsider posting advice to the bully about getting the Police in against their victim.

I look forward to your posts to Squeamous advising her to stay completely the fuck away from me, lest she gets her own nasty shit directed back at her. That is unless of course you all really are that fucked up in the head that you seriously believe a woman has the right to treat a man like a complete and utter piece of shit, and that the man isn't entitled to treat any such woman in exactly the same way.

[NotLettingItGo]

There is some good news to come from all of this.

I am now her equal, because I'm now just as willing to behave like she does

[mjmacky]

Much of this being news to me, I can only say this.

You people in the U.K. live too close to each other.
Reject, without picking up a side (since I'm too hip for that), Squeamous has not addressed you in any way. The "example" you linked, in an attempt to validate your claim, was so weak and stretched that I feel you might actually believe in god or something crazy like that.
I wish someone would have outed the specifics earlier so at least I could have some perspective, fuck all of you.

[NotLettingItGo]

Do you realize the position you've created for yourself here, Reject? You came here as a stalker. Regardless of how much you like it here, make friends, etc., you will always be a stalker until you stop posting, and go away. It doesn't matter how many times you say you are over her. Don't care, or are wonderfully happy with your wife/life. You are, and will always be seen as a stalker. There is a permanent, underlying creepiness to that. Can you understand that?

I came here as me, to talk to chavis... because I suspected he might be pretty much the same kind of nasty malicious cunt I've encountered in other places... however he wasn't/isn't. He does this whole big being cunty towards people thing, but underneath that he's a decent enough chap, like most here TBH.

I've stalked no one, I've had no contact with Squeamous other than to tell her to stay completely away from me when she chose to take a dig at me. I posted three posts about Fire Doors, none of which were actually addressed to her (because I couldn't bring myself to address her), and none of which contained anything other than information that she (and others) might find useful.

There are no posts by me directly addressing her or anything she has said anywhere on this board, because I wouldn't lower myself to address someone who behaves as she has towards me, and as I know she does towards others. If you'd like to produce some evidence which contradicts that statement please feel free to piss away some of your life finding and quoting them.

The posts I have made about the subject of 'that woman' have been in response to you and others raising the subject of her on thread after thread, not because I've been wandering around here raising her as a subject repeatedly.

In light of how I have behaved it would be fitting for you to apologise to me, for being so completely and utterly wrong, but I won't expect you to do that. I know you've been indoctrinated to defend women, who in your eyes can do no wrong no matter how they behave.

[NotLettingItGo]

...
Reject, without picking up a side (since I'm too hip for that), Squeamous has not addressed you in any way. The "example" you linked, in an attempt to validate your claim, was so weak and stretched that I feel you might actually believe in god or something crazy like that.
...

You are entitled to see it as weak, it is nonetheless what I said it is, and it kind of fucks up completely the claims manker made. You might like to consider that what to you might seem weak, could be perceived as something totally different by a man who had that woman lie and manipulate him for five years. From where I'm sitting she shouldn't be addressing me at all, let alone taking digs at me. It takes a particular kind of coward to take any kind of dig at someone they don't have the courage to stand and look at the face of.

[manker]

A woman who lied to me for five years and shit all over my thoughts and feelings, wasn't content with having treated me like shit in rl, and decided that she should also take swipes at me online. Even after being told that it really wasn't very difficult, all she had to do was stay completely away fron me, and I would stay completely away from her. She couldn't help her self and conitinued to take digs at me. Finally I went to talk to her about this, and now she's complaining about how I'm stalking her. Hmm the stalking accusations look a bit the wrong way around here don't they?

Quoted for posterity because you're a delusional fuckwit.

The only time she's even acknowledged your presence at fst is in this thread earlier today to call you a sad old man.
Unless I've missed the cavalcade of digs you refer to. Which is particularly unlikely because you've made them up.

Oh! manker, you really must see someone about this reading and comprehension problem you have.
https://filesharingtalk.com/threads/4...=1#post3621727

To which I sent this perfectly reasonable PM:

It's really... not very difficult. You stay completely away from me, and I stay completely away from you.

https://filesharingtalk.com/threads/4...=1#post3621727

Her response was to take a much more subtle line taking digs at me, but they're still digs and they're all there for you to go look out for yourself.

Ahh, you got me, I don't stalk squeams' posts as much as you do. I missed that one dig. Which, in all fairness, was the one time your existence was tenuously hinted at compared with your systematic - and daily - character assassination.

Yet you maintain that you're the victim. You said that it seems like she is stalking you.
You're a deluded fool.


There has been nothing before nor since. If your words are to be believed, then you confronted her because of the continued 'digs' but there have been none at all. Apart from the stab in the heart you perceive when you read that she has a life, and it's quite good.
That's not a dig, idiot. That's someone talking about what they did that day.

We all know that you confronted her and made up the crap about milfs in a hotel room because she posted about the new guy, which in turn dangerously exacerbated your ongoing mid-life crisis.
Which, incidentally, explains the comedy moustache.

[mjmacky]

You are entitled to see it as weak, it is nonetheless what I said it is, and it kind of fucks up completely the claims manker made. You might like to consider that what to you might seem weak, could be perceived as something totally different by a man who had that woman lie and manipulate him for five years. From where I'm sitting she shouldn't be addressing me at all, let alone taking digs at me. It takes a particular kind of coward to take any kind of dig at someone they don't have the courage to stand and look at the face of.

I'm outside to this, more so than everyone else commenting, but what is clear is that you're trying to fit the only time she mentioned reject (as a name) to actually fit you. Sorry, you don't own it, just as I don't own macky/jacky/mary/gary/susan. It also seems that you conveniently left out all contexts, such that the reject persona posts a bunch of whining wank and I once tied a knot between you and chavis. So like I said, a far stretch.

[mjmacky]

Ahh, you got me, I don't stalk squeams' posts as much as you do. I missed that one dig.

It was a dig at chavis, not at reject. Congrats, now you're both wrong.

[NotLettingItGo]

You're a wag.

I could tell you all about the MILFs in the hotel bar, about where they worked, and what lovely women they were. However I'm not going too. I don't care if you believe me. I know it's true.

As for her life going quite nicely, I'm really unsure why you think I would give any kind of shit about how her life is going at all?

As for 'her' well you're entitled to not be able to read and comprehend, just don't expect me to give your opinions any credence, given that even when the facts are pointed out to you, you still chose to come back at me and fail completely to tackle the woman who is behaving badly. I mean really, how hard would it have been for you to actually address her and tell her she really shouldn't be taking digs at a man who she has already shit all over, especially in light of her not having the courage to actually look that man in that face.

[NotLettingItGo]

It was a dig at chavis, not at reject. Congrats, now you're both wrong.

FFS! Jacky, do try to keep up and exhibit some kind of comprehension beyond that of a 4 year old.