Last edited by NotLettingItGo; 03-02-2012 at 02:54 PM.
I used extremes rather than absolutes for the very allusion you depict.
And no idea, I try to keep my PMs with Squeams strictly sexual. Any mention of you and I lose the will to jizz.
Right... I'll be honest, I think it takes some extremely warped view to proclaim my behaviour to have been extreme when your mate was really stalking me, and you've defended his behaviour and implied it was normal. All I ever did was defend myself against false accusations.
OK lets be clear, is the position of this board that I am not allowed to show any disrespect at all towards your friends whilst they wander around shitting all over me? Cause that's what it sounds like to me.
I might be going out on a limb here but poking about on the internets to have a look to see if someone's been an arse on different fora is pretty standard.
Declaring hate for all women is pretty damn extreme.
I reiterate. I don't give a fuck what you do as long as the forum doesn't turn into a shrine to your angst.
If it does, you'll find yourself on moderation because to remove your bile from the situation is to restore harmony.
This conclusion is brought to me via Occam's Razor.
Well I've expressed my views about how all women are untrustworthy, and that this has been proven to me by more than one woman, and that as such I will never allow another woman into my life. I have also expressed the view that no woman can expect me to respect them, their views or opinions, given that no woman has ever shown me such respect, and that some have specifically shown me nothing but disrespect despite knowing my views and opinions. But I haven't ever claimed I hate them all. So that can't apply to me.
That's exactly what I'm doing, and it shows that list of yours up.
The real options available to me are:
1. Leave, so that my internet s**g can shit all over you without you seeing it.
2. Stay, and accept my internet s**g shitting all over you.
3. Be under my moderation so that my internet s**g can shit all over you without interference.
IMO That's a pretty incredible position for this (or any board) board to take. To prioritise the right of one (or two) members of a board to shit upon a.n other member. To basically tell one member they are to be shit on no matter what they do, whilst you protect those who are shitting upon them from being treated equally.
Last edited by NotLettingItGo; 03-02-2012 at 03:40 PM.
Bookmarks