TB's rule!

[karachidude]

,as for the people who use seedboxes regularly,whats the harm??

Because most choose to abuse them to the determent of everyone else

'hit n run' rules should fix that,dont u think.what abuse other than 'hit n runs' are u talking about??

[IdolEyes787]

Because most choose to abuse them to the determent of everyone else

'hit n run' rules should fix that,dont u think.what abuse other than 'hit n runs' are u talking about??

So what you are saying is that if seedboxes monopolize bandwidth for an even longer period of time that would be good thing for my ratio .OK then.

[soulreaper]

At the very least the autosnatching needs to go. What a disgrace. Here's a sample -

rusak - UL - 112 TB. DL - 38 TB on what.cd

Not that I have anything against this guy , but you have to be blind to not see the disparity(I'm guessing that's autosnatching). rich getting richer , poor getting poorer and you call this a community? Get out of here.

[LazyGuy]

At the very least the autosnatching needs to go. What a disgrace. Here's a sample -

rusak - UL - 112 TB. DL - 38 TB on what.cd

Not that I have anything against this guy , but you have to be blind to not see the disparity(I'm guessing that's autosnatching). rich getting richer , poor getting poorer and you call this a community? Get out of here.

did that guy even listen to all of that 38TB he downloaded?
it must take him 38 years to listen to all of that stuff

[korton]

At the very least the autosnatching needs to go. What a disgrace. Here's a sample -

rusak - UL - 112 TB. DL - 38 TB on what.cd

Not that I have anything against this guy , but you have to be blind to not see the disparity(I'm guessing that's autosnatching). rich getting richer , poor getting poorer and you call this a community? Get out of here.

Are you serious?
That guy has uploaded over 4100 torrents and he is seeding well over 36k of audio torrents. He is most likely the only one seeder on loads of torrents. That user is doing a lot of good work community wise imo.

[karachidude]

that is correct,decent thing to do is then is to "not hit n run",maybe enforce a rule like that,why not give advice instead of making people who use them sound vile.

why cant a casual member just buy a seedbox instead of donating to survive on ratio trackers,a 20$ box should be enough to buffer 4-5 trackers for years of usage,as for the people who use seedboxes regularly,whats the harm?? most people take torrenting up as a hobby,more the money they invest the better for bittorrent.

donations while should me made as a token of gratitude instead of trying to survive on a tracker.

Are you a member of BCG? we changed it to nullify the bad effects of Seedboxes, I was talking more a global ratio tracker.

And if everyone paid for a seedbox, no one would donate, or if they did, it would be to survive, on BCG we dont ban for low ratio, we even give ratio to a 1:1 just for trying.

.

i was but know inactive,and thats cool,bcg's come up with a system to make it easier for the users,you have tried to nullify the bad effects of seedboxes while still being able to take advantage of the benefits seedboxes bring,all because your a decent guy.

global ratio trackers too would come up with similar systems,but they dont,because they are making money off it,this is though not a side effect of the seedbox culture,if anything cheap seedboxes are a way around the blackmail these trackers do.

'hit n run' rules should fix that,dont u think.what abuse other than 'hit n runs' are u talking about??

So what you are saying is that if seedboxes monopolize bandwidth for an even longer period of time that would be good thing for my ratio .OK then.

most trackers give incentives like bonus points and freeleech,for example on filelist.ro files larger than 4gbs are free,ipt got a brilliant bonus system along with freeleech,your ratio should be ok if you utilize them.

its a win win,the seedbox monopoly would mean faster torrents,while still letting the casual user survive.