Arizona tries to close FST.

[Artemis]

It does if he says it backwards

[mjmacky]

It does if he says it backwards

It of porn is there, exists it if.

I think that's Yoda's response to, "what's your favorite fetish?".

[Artemis]

It does if he says it backwards

It of porn is there, exists it if.

I think that's Yoda's response to, "what's your favorite fetish?".

My favorite porn fetish is watching it on fast forward, it's hilarious!

[manker]

Of course it works in reverse. I'll demonstrate how with the gift of words.

If rule 34 states pornography or sexually related material exists for any conceivable subject, then the existence of the subject is implied by the existence of its porn derivative.

I posted anime containing a naked redneck family fucking a horse, one implication thereof is that redneck anime exists.

[Artemis]

Of course it works in reverse. I'll demonstrate how with the gift of words.

If rule 34 states pornography or sexually related material exists for any conceivable subject, then the existence of the subject is implied by the existence of its porn derivative.

I posted anime containing a naked redneck family fucking a horse, one implication thereof is that redneck anime exists.

You used too many words, you need too keep your sentences shorter and more concise to stop your audience from falling asleep.

[manker]

I've got Mary chastising me for not making long enough posts, and now you saying that they're too verbose.

Anyway, I've made a mental note: Mary can't get enough of my soliloquies and if you read more than three sentences, you get crotchety.

[Snee]

To Long; Didn't Read?

[mjmacky]

Of course it works in reverse. I'll demonstrate how with the gift of words.

If rule 34 states pornography or sexually related material exists for any conceivable subject, then the existence of the subject is implied by the existence of its porn derivative.

I posted anime containing a naked redneck family fucking a horse, one implication thereof is that redneck anime exists.

You're trying to get away with it. The rule only states that porn covers existing subject, but there is no exclusive requirement in said rule. That being, that you can have porn for things that don't exist. I'll submit an example.

P.S. It was taking too long to find a decent porno (older mythologies just seemed too accessible), and I didn't want to do the Silverman thing, so I just made my own. How can this porno exist by your assumption?

jkpr0n.gif

[mjmacky]

To Long; Didn't Read?

I am not one to long for a read that is too long to read.

[manker]

Of course it works in reverse. I'll demonstrate how with the gift of words.

If rule 34 states pornography or sexually related material exists for any conceivable subject, then the existence of the subject is implied by the existence of its porn derivative.

I posted anime containing a naked redneck family fucking a horse, one implication thereof is that redneck anime exists.

You're trying to get away with it. The rule only states that porn covers existing subject, but there is no exclusive requirement in said rule. That being, that you can have porn for things that don't exist. I'll submit an example.

P.S. It was taking too long to find a decent porno (older mythologies just seemed too accessible), and I didn't want to do the Silverman thing, so I just made my own. How can this porno exist by your assumption?

jkpr0n.gif

Your point detracts from your stance

The rule I posted is the real and actual rule. The one you alluded to is the shorthand version for people who are hard of reading and/or thinking.