Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Article: MPAA: you can infringe copyright just by embedding a video

  1. #1
    Cabalo's Avatar FileSharingTalker BT Rep: +24BT Rep +24BT Rep +24BT Rep +24BT Rep +24
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    European Union
    Age
    48
    Posts
    11,834

  2. vBCms Comments   -   #2
    Surely it makes no sense to go after the site using the embedding if they really want there content removing?

  3. vBCms Comments   -   #3
    mjmacky's Avatar an alchemist?
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    10,809
    I think the porn tube sites are doing this very thing to escape vulnerability. If you notice, there are numerous hosting sites, and numerous linking sites, making not any one of them in particular a valuable target. If I recall, Perfect 10 is a porn producer so that might have made a major impact in the current organization.

  4. vBCms Comments   -   #4
    Pretty soon it's going to be illegal to think about copyrighted content.

  5. vBCms Comments   -   #5
    By this logic any images from the movies you remember is a tertiary infringement?

  6. vBCms Comments   -   #6
    Quote Originally Posted by duke0102 View Post
    Surely it makes no sense to go after the site using the embedding if they really want there content removing?
    see, the flaw with your statement is that you are assuming that the MPAA operates based on what "makes sense".

    The case has been plagued by confusion over the difference between hosting a video and embedding a video hosted by someone else.
    thats another problem. judges and lawyers that dont even understand half of the argument. so judges just make a decision based on some skewed, invalid analogy.
    Last edited by bobbintb; 04-12-2012 at 02:49 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •