That fact is, numbnuts, that the stories are completely different so calling it a rip-off is extreme.
Again, learn the difference between similarity and rip-off. You said shitall about key points. You called it a blatant rip-off.
Now you are even backtracking by reaching with "far in excess of a normal person". How about just saying Doe is a rip-off by "having a male in the starring role" to prove your point.
If John Doe's premise "of course" predates the release of Bourne howz about a little less talking and a little more STFU about it being a blatant rip-off since you obviously haven't the slightest clue wtf you are arguing anymore?
Bookmarks