mfwimages.jpg
I see what you did there.
Everything is brought to you by Fjohürs Lykkewe.
Well actually some Cams of the latest movies can look very nice & some can look like shit it all depends on the type the person uses & how there doing it & if there in a theater with a lot of people for example i saw a Russian Cam of Monsters University back when it was still in theaters the quality actually looked decent but threw it a number of people got up & there was a little girl standing & blocking the movie theater screen threw the middle of the film so yeah it was bad but some parts were watchable my point is not all Cams suck some are good & some suck it all depends plus have you guys ever heard of a telesync or for short (TS) its the same thing as a Cam Rip just done in a more professional way in the movie theaters.
Off and on, I've been sampling cams since I started this thread about 1.5yrs ago. Not much has improved. E.g., I just sat thru a 1.5Gb CAM of Prisoners (2013) ... and image-wise it sucked big time. (Not sure why the file was THAT huge given quality). Audio was decent however (hearing impaired headphone feed in theater??)
Waiting for Gravity tho' most CAMmers say this one is really worth the $15 for 3D+large screen+audio. Speaking of worth and convenience .... well if there is one take-home lesson, it's that if you can wait an extra two mos., for a "legitimate rip" (LOL!!!), it's way worth it for the HUGE gains in quality ... not unless you're real old or have cancer or in a war-torn land ... or it's on your toilet-side iPad ... then, enjoy it as soon as you can ... and don't forget to wipe![]()
Last edited by mh1313; 10-14-2013 at 07:22 AM.
Decartes said it pretty much centuries ago .... iTurd, therefore I am
IAC, Apple's been stealin' for decades ... but they don't get ... uh ... poo poo'd 'cause Jobs looks so pretty male-modelly in close-ups that stock-photoists sell to Time and Life ... and, boo effin' hoo ... he died from da C word.
...s'cuse me ... I gotta #2, again![]()
Bookmarks