I think I just end up getting trolled on dating sites

[Quarterquack]

It seems like you're on about a liqueur, but what is this in relation to?

While I'm at it, I just want to say it's extremely selfish of you to expect me to read and appreciate your misdirection, but you refuse to even try indulge mine.

[mjmacky]

It seems like you're on about a liqueur, but what is this in relation to?

While I'm at it, I just want to say it's extremely selfish of you to expect me to read and appreciate your misdirection, but you refuse to even try indulge mine.

I didn't agree to let you rimjob me under the pretense that I was going to return any favors. It's an issue of presumption. I hope you didn't give me butt herpes.

[Quarterquack]

The implied meaning of nsfw is not so much that it would get you in trouble at work so much as it creates disjointed explanations between men and their misseses. It's just been repurposed like that, you know, like cucumbers.

Also, my current avy predates whatever you're talking about that I don't quite remember, and I reminded myself to do it when Dave promised to make a hate site about me.

Pretty sure a substantial amount of misseses would enjoy that picture more than their men. Either way, nice to know that you have your dating sites while Ivana (was it?) has cucumbers. Have you come across the theory yet that she has put on all these personas of dating women on an intranet, including dave, manker and I, all just to slowly drive you into insanity?

I'm talking about another one of our flirt sessions. I hope you know that my pants are really heavy. If we keep dancing for long, they're dropping and not coming back up.

[mjmacky]

Either way, nice to know that you have your dating sites while Ivana (was it?) has cucumbers. Have you come across the theory yet that she has put on all these personas of dating women on an intranet, including dave, manker and I, all just to slowly drive you into insanity?

I've read her some of these correspondences because sometimes she's around when I'm going over them and you know when you have that urge to put another set of eyes on what you're witnessing? Something like that. There's not much wit in her writing style though... so it doesn't work.

[Quarterquack]

I didn't agree to let you rimjob me under the pretense that I was going to return any favors. It's an issue of presumption. I hope you didn't give me butt herpes.

If I've already gotten to the unholieth base with you, what make you of your blog wars with 'ole dave? That's surely evolved into a fantastical love affair. I think you can do without prostituting yourself any longer.

Now, stop painting yourself with a saintly pink brush. Post the 50+ message tango where you end up standing up the dame.

P.S. This thread reminded me of a guy I stumbled across earlier on today, announcing he refuses to be a dating site for mercury dumpers and mercury hunters.

[Quarterquack]

I've read her some of these correspondences because sometimes she's around when I'm going over them and you know when you have that urge to put another set of eyes on what you're witnessing? Something like that. There's not much wit in her writing style though... so it doesn't work.

Although I haven't been in the situation personally, yes, I do know. I can understand the dilemma between figuring out whether the course of conversation is following the script for "Me and You and Everyone we know", or is just a giant misunderstanding. A friend who trolls dating sites on the regular always has me read his hilarities. He even does recruitment. Found a 5th year Psychology course pack of a poor girl. Sent her an e-mail telling her her only method of contact with him is through eHarmony. Heartless bastard.

[mjmacky]

Post the 50+ message tango where you end up standing up the dame.

I'll post the last message from one of them, which occurred after I described my situation with Ivana. Supposedly, I was not going to be hooking up with this girl (in any social context, so I meant that generally) because she had been recently engaged.

First. My impulse is to feel bad for you. But I understand you'd probably not care too much for that sentiment.

Second. I looked at my previous reply. And I find myself disgusted at my constant references to my so-called "fiancee". Some silly things have happened in those 2 weeks since I last replied to you. My parents are getting divorced. Which is fine. But I defended my father, and I was subsequently kicked out. My boyfriend was right around the corner from me and never offered to help me out. Even though we go to the same school and work the same job. He just told me to "deal with it" and "suck it up", in the face of homelessness. Anyways ... I've gotten fed up with feeling shitty on a continuous basis. I'm done with him. But I'd rather wait until after our exams are done. Just so that he has time to Baker Act himself without failing.

I think, I am just too goddamn nice and self-sacrificing to deserve a guy who doesn't care as much as I'd hoped. I am, once again, sick of men. And being close to them. Letting my walls down. It disgusts me at how vulnerable and naïve I became at the simple suggestion of marriage, that I would let him treat me however he liked, used me, and still continued to be a horrible human being. Yeah. That's my rant for the week.

She then deleted her account and I never heard from her again neither through text nor email. In the end I decided she talked about her "fiancee" too much anyway and I wrote the whole thing off. Anyways, my point in this is that it's really just a lot of text without anything really interesting.

[mjmacky]

Although I haven't been in the situation personally, yes, I do know. I can understand the dilemma between figuring out whether the course of conversation is following the script for "Me and You and Everyone we know", or is just a giant misunderstanding. A friend who trolls dating sites on the regular always has me read his hilarities. He even does recruitment. Found a 5th year Psychology course pack of a poor girl. Sent her an e-mail telling her her only method of contact with him is through eHarmony. Heartless bastard.

I do have a fake profile up to mess with some of these hypocrites. It's the most boring thing you'll ever read, but has a couple of pictures and a high income listed. He gets a lot of messages telling him that's he's very interesting.

[Quarterquack]

I'll post the last message from one of them, which occurred after I described my situation with Ivana. Supposedly, I was not going to be hooking up with this girl (in any social context, so I meant that generally) because she had been recently engaged.

...

She then deleted her account and I never heard from her again neither through text nor email. In the end I decided she talked about her "fiancee" too much anyway and I wrote the whole thing off. Anyways, my point in this is that it's really just a lot of text without anything really interesting.

I disagree. This girl is pretty interesting. The way she took her time typing naive properly. The fact that she had expressly stated to you that there was to be no hook-up, and yet she used you as an emotional buffer, specifically avoiding contact with anyone in her physical proximity by falling back to taboo dating sites before trouble occurred. The fact that this previous fact suggests she's probably a consistent emotional wreck and the "suck it up" was advice rather than apathy. If for nothing, it's the gems like Sara that make me highly interested in trying out these sites. Not for the laughs but for the personalities.

I do have a fake profile up to mess with some of these hypocrites. It's the most boring thing you'll ever read, but has a couple of pictures and a high income listed. He gets a lot of messages telling him that's he's very interesting.

People trying to find someone who will definitely not care about them, on a site intended for the opposite? You don't say!

[mjmacky]

I disagree. This girl is pretty interesting. The way she took her time typing naive properly. The fact that she had expressly stated to you that there was to be no hook-up, and yet she used you as an emotional buffer, specifically avoiding contact with anyone in her physical proximity by falling back to taboo dating sites before trouble occurred. The fact that this previous fact suggests she's probably a consistent emotional wreck and the "suck it up" was advice rather than apathy. If for nothing, it's the gems like Sara that make me highly interested in trying out these sites. Not for the laughs but for the personalities.

Sometimes you'll find a personality, now you're forcing me to dig up the relevant part of that message.

Sara: I'm wondering .... In the most egotistical sense possible, why do you continue to correspond with me, regardless of my current relationship? Am I honestly that interesting? I apologize, but I am born and raised a Class A suspicious and skeptical individual.

Mary: Well if not anything else, your upfront and candid honesty makes conversation with you interesting, fun. That quip aside, I'd expect the skepticism based on the context, as it would have me just as suspicious. In that regard, I'm glad you asked because explaining it without inquiry would seem kind of odd and out of place.

The reasons why I continue to message you are quite different than when I initiated contact. At first it was just an interesting profile and a cute pic (though I'm admittedly weary of 1 pic profiles, something carried on from a previous acquaintance from years back). It's a bit of self gratification to see if females find me interesting or attractive, thus the probes are sent out to try to validate the strong sense of self-confidence. In reality I tend to believe others don't have a very appealing perception of me due to my intense, frank, and at times caustic personality. I tend to alienate people based on their complete ineptitude at critical thinking and eventual narrow mindedness. Uncharacteristic to my misanthropic ways, I still socialize and talk to new people, always in search of that new perspective.

Still, while continuing our messages, I didn't necessarily have any expectations or angles to work, you are a pleasure to converse with. I am for the most part, a pretty asexual individual, though I'd still have eunuchs and Tesla scoff at my remark. The conversation is what interests me and keeps my lazy ass invested in the effort. After that initial point, you demonstrated, if I can be so cliched, a refreshing outlook, and that's something of value that I'd be hard pressed to dismiss.

So here's to hoping that would make sense, I typed it all out on my phone (kind of limiting my editing capacity). You have to admit if I said all that unprovoked, it would have been quite creepy. Well not that I can claim to be creep-free, I am just able to act with social sensibility when it's worth it.

So now my question for you. Knowing how most guys function on here, are you still going to manage your account given the recent developments? I mean it has to be quite a workload to filter through all the messages, on top of potentially upsetting a jealous fiancee (not that I would assume he is the jealous type, but not knowing anything about him, it's a possibility in my mind). As a follow up to that question, did you have an agenda while talking to me that may no longer be valid? Yikes that sounds a bit confrontational, but I can only assure you it's not... just can't think of another way to word it at the moment and I want to send this out before some unexpected app crash.

Alright, here's to hoping for a reply

Sara: I honestly didn't have any expectations to begin with either, upon initial conversation. Then I began to see some sort of connection, which I am attributing to intellectual conversation. Oh and, of course, my need to have male attention. That sounds horrible, but it's the truth. However, like I am sure I have said countless times, I'm hard pressed to find any male within my age group to carry intellectual conversations without some ulterior motive to get me in bed.

I feel as though I would only continue my account, as I thought about last night, to continue talking to you. Now that, in itself, shocks me. And I feel like continuing a personal reference to you in that matter, as opposed to a general reason, could be misconstrued for a number of reasons. But I'd rather ignore whatever that reason might be, besides my intense love of decent conversation with a member of the opposite sex.

I appreciate the compliments on my interesting something-or-another, but I am wholly confident a multitude of women in our area could be the same as me, if not more interesting.

Does that whole stream of thought answer your question? I honestly wish I could have explained that better, but I am horrid at organizing my thoughts when answering personal questions.

Sara: Also, if given the right circumstances, I most likely would've been attracted to you. I have a strange, masochistic interest in men who are superior to me intellectually. My fiancée is a former med student, who was forced to drop out due to unfortunate financial issues that were out of his control. So, based on his experience in med school, he has more knowledge and skill in the medical field than I do. And that I find incredibly attractive, among other things.

I enjoy intellectually superior men. End of story. I'm sure that's some sort of complex that's deeply rooted in my childhood somewhere. But I avoid psychoanalysis of myself whenever possible.