effendi
Yes indeed. I'm your man if you want to know about something that happened in the beforetime - precluding the last century.Originally Posted by Squeamous
60s actually
Yuno nothing about the 'foretime?
I'm just not interested in that at all.
It seems shit.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
an alchemist?
Please tell me you know who Audrey Hepburn is, at the very very least.
Everything is brought to you by Fjohürs Lykkewe.
effendi
Yeah someone had her as an avatar on this very board a few years ago. I googled her back then.Please tell me you know who Audrey Hepburn is, at the very very least.
She didn't do any nudes.
Last edited by manker; 07-14-2012 at 01:41 PM. Reason: beyonce
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Poster
You don't have to be interested in it to know about it. Knowledge you're interested in is a hobby. Knowledge you're not interested in is intelligence.
effendi
The first sentence is absolutely true. The second is tenuous at best, the third is complete shite.You don't have to be interested in it to know about it. Knowledge you're interested in is a hobby. Knowledge you're not interested in is intelligence.
After I wrote that last night, I realised that I like the first two or three decades of the 1900s, and the 90s, too. Most of the stuff in between, with lots of notable exceptions, is just awkward.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
an alchemist?
I've always identified intelligence as a willingness to learn, regardless of interest, so it's kind of close to mine. One doesn't have to know these things already because it'd be a pity if intelligence depended too strongly on your ability to not forget something.
Everything is brought to you by Fjohürs Lykkewe.
effendi
I identified strongly with what you wrote so I changed it such that it's now exactly congruent with my own feelings on the matter.I've always identified intelligence asa willingnessa measurement of a person's ability to learn, regardless of interest. One doesn't have to know these things already because it'd be a pity if intelligence depended too strongly on your ability to not forget something.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
sprclfrglstcxpldcs
BT Rep: +3
If this were about chemistry, you'd be Einsteinium.
Ellipses go here.
an alchemist?
Yeah, well at least I don't have to wait for the jury. I formulated mine after noticing the dumbest fucks are the ones who tend to say "I don't care to know" the most. That and conversations with people who treat all knowledge with earnest pleasure create environments with higher intellectual fervor.I identified strongly with what you wrote so I changed it such that it's now exactly congruent with my own feelings on the matter.
Everything is brought to you by Fjohürs Lykkewe.
effendi
That lovely anecdotal explanation doesn't make your assertion any the less wrong, but it did enable me to see exactly from whence your point came - almost to the point of agreeing with you.Yeah, well at least I don't have to wait for the jury. I formulated mine after noticing the dumbest fucks are the ones who tend to say "I don't care to know" the most. That and conversations with people who treat all knowledge with earnest pleasure create environments with higher intellectual fervor.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks