Wacko Jacko Arrested

[muchspl2]

Originally posted by ezyryder+22 November 2003 - 10:08--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ezyryder &#064; 22 November 2003 - 10:08)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Pitbul@22 November 2003 - 09:01
that whole thing had some pionts in their that sounded like bullshit. sounded like he was told what to say. when i was 13 i deffinitly couldn&#39;t write that. also 13 year olds dotn belong in 8th grade. thats to young. but then again thats not me. this latest acusation does seem like someones out for money. parents know MJ&#39;s past so why in the hell do they let their kids go their? i wouldn&#39;t let my children go to his house.

thats what i thought, but then these things (if jouvonile) may be paraphrased by the resident detective. [/b][/quote]

of coarse, the kid doesn&#39;t write the police paper work, he just signs the at the end thats how it works, unless you think the cop was in on the conspiracy

[UKMan]

Originally posted by brotherdoobie@23 November 2003 - 05:57
1: Do you think you or I would be given the benefit of doubt if we
slept in the same bed with children who were not our own?

2: A fair trial works both ways.
This young child is treated as if he did something wrong.
(such as money being his motive for doing this.)

3: Are you defending him also U.K.? (the child)

4: Rather he is guilty or not is up to the courts to decide.
I however am entitled to my informed opinions.........As you are.

5: By the way this is not the first time he has been accused of such things.

6: A question for you?..........Why in our society do we jump to the defense
of someone with money and power, (spouting right to a fair trial rhetoric)
while the alleged victim is made out to be an money grubbing opportunist?

Peace brotherdoobie

1: No i dont - simply because most people are assholes who automatically assume that its about sex.

2: A fair trial yes. As to how the child is being treated, you cannot blame me - i have not accused either the child or MJ - read my posts again and reform your questions.

3: You are not reading my posts.

4: Isnt that what im saying??

5: No it isnt the first time. Does that make him guilty?

6: I jump to the defence of anyone who is automatically proclaimed guilty by assholes who know nothing more than what they read in the newspapers.
ONCE AGAIN I HAVE NOT ACCUSED THE CHILD - READ MY POSTS - Do not compare me with society when i am so obviously against it&#33;&#33;

Peace
UKMan

[brotherdoobie]

1: No i dont - simply because most people are assholes who automatically assume that its about sex.

2: A fair trial yes. As to how the child is being treated, you cannot blame me - i have not accused either the child or MJ - read my posts again and reform your questions.

3: You are not reading my posts.

4: Isnt that what im saying??

5: No it isnt the first time. Does that make him guilty?

6: I jump to the defence of anyone who is automatically proclaimed guilty by assholes who know nothing more than what they read in the newspapers.
ONCE AGAIN I HAVE NOT ACCUSED THE CHILD - READ MY POSTS - Do not compare me with society when i am so obviously against it&#33;&#33;



My Response

1. Well mabey he is just a nice guy who happens to like sleeping with kids

2. True.

3.Yes I assure you I have.

4.Is it?

5. No.......but it raises more than my eyebrows?

6. Fair enough..........Except I dont read the newspaper


I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this one

Peace brotherdoobie

[UKMan]

Originally posted by brotherdoobie@23 November 2003 - 11:38
My Response

1. Well mabey he is just a nice guy who happens to like sleeping with kids

2. True.

3.Yes I assure you I have.

4.Is it?

5. No.......but it raises more than my eyebrows?

6. Fair enough..........Except I dont read the newspaper


I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this one

Peace brotherdoobie

Yes - agree to disagree - hopefully a court of his and the childs peers will also have the same understanding. Though i doubt it very much. This case has been so tainted allready, the outcome is inevitable. If he is not guilty, i doubt whether or not we shall ever know. Irrefutable evidence has been proven otherwise before - why not here?

1: Why does that sound so nasty when said like that?
2: - we agree on that one.
3: In which case then let me make it clearer: I am not defending or accusing anyone.
4: Yes - its up to the courts - and yes you are entitled to your opinion.
5: Your jumping to conclusions as are most others. The only reason this is being splashed all over the planet again is because he is rich/famous/likes children/has influence etc etc - big news makes money, damned if they are guilty or not. I refuse to get sucked up into that kind of media circus.
6: - we agree on that too.

Peace
UKMan

[wormless]

y dont they do swobs? or did they do that? swob michael and swob the child

[brotherdoobie]

Originally posted by wormless@23 November 2003 - 06:32
y dont they do swobs? or did they do that? swob michael and swob the child

Are you suggesting DNA testing Worm?
It&#39;s much to late for that.


Peace brotherdoobie B)

[The Real Santa]

oh thats what he ment

[the_faceman]

[Gutter]

nice find face




@wormless, you mean swab?
i believe it is too late for that testing

[N£MO]

Lock him up and throw away the key.He is a sick fuck.