Your Ad Here Your Ad Here
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: Best Cards For Proformance

  1. #1
    krome's Avatar triplesix clubhouse
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    miami , fl
    Posts
    596
    Which is a good card for Proformance, besides the ghaphic and FX..

    ATI RADEON™ 9800 or 128MB DDR GeForce FX 5200....

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #2
    OMG man the ATI RADEON 9800 pisses over the FX 5200

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #3
    L0rD_S0tH's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Dargaard Keep
    Posts
    230
    comparing a fx 5200 to a 9800!? Thats nuts. Go with the 9800 all the way.

    Did you mean the Fx 5900? or 5950?

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #4
    well if u are comparing those 2 it seem kinda unfair. the 5200 is the low end card, like the mx series. but then again, the 9800 cost 3x as much as the 5200.

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #5
    Supernatural's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    New York
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,123
    Depends on how much you are willing to spend. Get a Radeon 9800 if if u can afford it, or a GeForce 5950. 9700 are great deals if u can find them. There are still a couple circling around, so snatch one up while you can. Radeon 9600 is the best of the mid-ranged cards, as you will have to be very lucky to find a Radeon 9500. GeForce 5600 should be the bare minimum. Don't waste your money on the low end 5200 or Radeon 9000/9100/9200.

    PS. Do not, under any circumstances, get the GeForce 5800. It's expensive and you don't get the performance you pay for. Radeon is better.

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #6
    krome's Avatar triplesix clubhouse
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    miami , fl
    Posts
    596
    bought me a dell computer the 2400 at dell.com it asked me which one you want, out of those 2 thats why i asked so i went and got me

    *** ATI RADEON 9800 *** it only cost me 180 real price for the card by itself to bulid it in is like 400 right?? well thanks for da tip.....

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #7
    no. 180 is about right for a non pro 9800...

    it's still a heck of a card though and depending on which type you got could be modded into into a pro...

    rk

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #8
    bigdawgfoxx's Avatar Big Dawg
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    29
    Posts
    3,833
    Most 2400's suck. There not expandable and usually come with Celerons....what does yours have? Cuz it might not even be fast enough to use that to the best of its advantages...but have fun
    [SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
    1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
    HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #9
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,491
    Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@21 November 2003 - 21:12
    Most 2400's suck. There not expandable and usually come with Celerons....what does yours have? Cuz it might not even be fast enough to use that to the best of its advantages...but have fun
    you lisening to those voices agian?

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #10
    bigdawgfoxx's Avatar Big Dawg
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    29
    Posts
    3,833
    Uh no. My x had a 2400. It had a 2.4 Ghz celeron and 256MB of ram and sucked ass... thats just my opinion. I have also been on some others. If his has a P4 it prob good, but there just not as good. And if you have a celeron at 2 Ghz your not gona be able to play awesome games very well newayz...or at least from my exsperiance.
    [SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
    1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
    HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •