Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Article: UK Judge Orders Apple To Publicly State On Its Website That Samsung Didn't C

  1. #1
    Cabalo's Avatar FileSharingTalker BT Rep: +24BT Rep +24BT Rep +24BT Rep +24BT Rep +24
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    European Union
    Age
    48
    Posts
    11,834

  2. vBCms Comments   -   #2
    Great news for Samsung but I imagine Apple will place this message on there own adverts in massive 1 pixel text at the bottom.

  3. vBCms Comments   -   #3
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    28
    Awesome news for Samsung, I despise Apple....

  4. vBCms Comments   -   #4
    Xbox_360's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    69
    I wish the judge would have also said in huge text in the top of the page, it would have made my day. Apple will more then likely hide it so well in small text that even using a magnifying glass you wouldn't find it.
    Last edited by Xbox_360; 07-20-2012 at 12:23 AM.

  5. vBCms Comments   -   #5
    TheFoX's Avatar www.arsebook.com
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,560
    Makes you wonder doesn't it. I am surprised that Apple didn't try to sue the BBC for its use of the letter 'i' in the word iPlayer, considering that Apple use the letter 'i' for things like iPad (pad), iPhone (phone), iPod (mp3/4 player).

    Obviously, their use of the letter 'i' is some sort of trademark, since phone, pad and pod are already words of the English language.

    Normally, when people copy a concept, you endeavour to do better. No one can possibly protect ALL ideas and concepts, and a certain amount of copying is naturally going to happen. After all, the new colonies still speak English, French and Spanish, with a smattering of Dutch and Portugese. No NEW languages have evolved in those colonies. They have copied what has gone before.

    Also, imagine a world where AMD were not allowed to copy the Intel instruction set, meaning that the only company who could make a PC was Intel. Our machines would have still been overpriced. Having competition means that pricing is more competitive. If Apple were the only ones to make a smartphone, who knows how expensive it would be.
    Last edited by TheFoX; 07-21-2012 at 08:47 AM.

  6. vBCms Comments   -   #6
    MysticRiffs's Avatar Super Ninja Smurf
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Townsville, Australia
    Posts
    65
    Quote Originally Posted by TheFoX View Post
    Makes you wonder doesn't it. I am surprised that Apple didn't try to sue the BBC for its use of the letter 'i' in the word iPlayer, considering that Apple use the letter 'i' for things like iPad (pad), iPhone (phone), iPod (mp3/4 player).

    Obviously, their use of the letter 'i' is some sort of trademark, since phone, pad and pod are already words of the English language.

    Normally, when people copy a concept, you endeavour to do better. No one can possibly protect ALL ideas and concepts, and a certain amount of copying is naturally going to happen. After all, the new colonies still speak English, French and Spanish, with a smattering of Dutch and Portugese. No NEW languages have evolved in those colonies. They have copied what has gone before.

    Also, imagine a world where AMD were not allowed to copy the Intel instruction set, meaning that the only company who could make a PC was Intel. Our machines would have still been overpriced. Having competition means that pricing is more competitive. If Apple were the only ones to make a smartphone, who knows how expensive it would be.
    Not as silly as it sounds, yep. Microsoft got the shaft twice, now. First for naming the Modern UI Metro, and now for the name SkyDrive.


    To name a thing, is to pay it respect.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •