Sheesh.
You dredged up a two and a half year old post to correct VB?
That sir, is dedication.
Weird though.
Sheesh.
You dredged up a two and a half year old post to correct VB?
That sir, is dedication.
Weird though.
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
Yeah but I did post it as a question. See the punctuation?Originally Posted by Virtualbody1234
In comparison with a Pentium 4 @3.0 ghz, the new CPU is supposed to run at 3.0 ghz X 1000=3000GHZ? wtf? whoa...Originally Posted by mooseman2070
Biostar XE T5
i5-750 @ 4.0 GHZ stable (CM Hyper 212)
2 x 2GB Cosair XMS3 DDR3 1600MHZ
Radeon 5850 @ 866/1254MHZ
Intel X25-M in RAID 0
WD Caviar Black 2TB in RAID 0
3 x Asus 25.5" VW266H LCD [Eyefinity]
Meh.Originally Posted by Seedler
AMD will make one which does more work at only 2000GHz.
.Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Originally Posted by lynx
The funny thing is, you're probably right.
if this post is 2 1/2 years old and this technology was supposed to be so cool, then where the hell is it? I want a damn laser cpu damnit!!
thats a nice response clocker, best thing i heard todayOriginally Posted by clocker
Bookmarks