How Many Files Are You Sharing?

[cynic]

About 1700 files, 1gig software, 5 gig mp3, thats all for me at the moment.

[Autumn Fox]

Sometimes ago i've made a post here, time for an update.
Now i share 108 movie files (mostly highest quality i can find anime), 248 .pdf documents, 263 MP3. All to all 10.6 GB.

[NoSoup4You]

NoSoup4You@Kazaa currently sharing 11 files.

Would be more, 'cept I was using Windows Millenium edition (what a piece of ****) and it dumped my hard drive. It adds up to 3.17 GB.
All Operating Systems...
MS-DOS 6.0, 6.22, Windows 3.1, Windows for Workgroups 3.11, Windows 95, Win95 Upgrade, Windows 98SE, Windows 2000, Windows ME, and Windows XP.

[CaptainBirdEyes]

I'm currently sharing 807 files, about 40 gigs.

I can't believe 10% of people who voted are leeches, who would admit that, they can at least have one user uploading at a time, and limit their bandwith so they don't take too much.

[Autumn Fox]

Originally posted by NoSoup4You@14 January 2004 - 18:59
(...)
MS-DOS 6.0, 6.22, Windows 3.1, Windows for Workgroups 3.11, Windows 95, Win95 Upgrade, Windows 98SE, Windows 2000, Windows ME, and Windows XP.

Why d'you have 'em ? Only WinXP and maybe WinNT are worth attention.

[{I}{K}{E}]

so many leeches on this board?



{I}{K}{E}

[NightStalker]

I'm steadily ripping my own albums and sharing downloaded files.

Regards, NightStalker.

[Autumn Fox]

Originally posted by {I}{K}{E}@15 January 2004 - 00:16
so many leeches on this board?   



{I}{K}{E}

Maybe, just maybe some of them by that ment that they aren't using any P2P programs ?

[{I}{K}{E}]

Originally posted by Autumn Fox@15 January 2004 - 00:53
Maybe, just maybe some of them by that ment that they aren't using any P2P programs ?

then you should not vote here

{I}{K}{E}

[NoSoup4You]

Originally posted by Autumn Fox+15 January 2004 - 00:05--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Autumn Fox @ 15 January 2004 - 00:05)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-NoSoup4You@14 January 2004 - 18:59
(...)
MS-DOS 6.0, 6.22, Windows 3.1, Windows for Workgroups 3.11, Windows 95, Win95 Upgrade, Windows 98SE, Windows 2000, Windows ME, and Windows XP.

Why d&#39;you have &#39;em ? Only WinXP and maybe WinNT are worth attention. [/b][/quote]
Windows NT and Windows XP won&#39;t run on a 386, 486, pentium, or pentium two.

And, I absolutely refuse to use Windows XP. Privacy concerns ya know. I don&#39;t like the fact of having to let Microsoft know every time I update my hardware, it&#39;s none of their damn business.

Windows 2000 gives me all the use that XP did (I ran it long enough to find out how crappy it really is), without any invasion of privacy, and with less crashing.

As for the rest, I can&#39;t help it if I like old operating systems.
I still think MS-DOS 6.22 with Windows for Workgroups 3.11 was one of the most stable Operating systems of all time.

I&#39;m even tempted to set up a dual boot between WFWG 3.11 (with DOS 6.22) and Win2k.