-
Originally posted by muchspl2+4 December 2003 - 05:28--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (muchspl2 @ 4 December 2003 - 05:28)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Wizzandabe@4 December 2003 - 13:14
I dont even have Roaxi installed. I use A120% along with Roxio 6.
witch is it
I find people who bought a pc that had roxio stay with it even after knowing its downfalls
same thing with norton users [/b][/quote]
lmfao couldnt agree more...norton hahahaha
ok now to the topic....tsk tsk dont compare alcohol 120% and nero..... why divide when you can unite? NERO+ALCOHOL is the best!
-
-
12-04-2003, 05:15 PM
Software & Hardware -
#12
Poster
You can't compare Alcohol with Nero.
Alcohol is specifically designed to backup copy protected CDs. Nero isn't.
Nero is an overall burner which allows you to create CD compilations like Audio CDs, Video CDs, Super Video CDs, CD Extra, UDF, Bootable CDs, etc. You can't do this with Alcohol.
Alcohol should be compared with BlindWrite or CloneCD, which are also burning programs that try to beat copy protections.
Nero should be compared with Roxio's Easy CD Creator or WinOnCd, which are overall burners too.
PS: Everyone who uses EZ CD Cremator must have another burning program because it can't burn BIN/CUE files.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks