i have a powercolor. certainly microcenter would have something better than powercolor to displayOriginally posted by TheFilePirater@6 December 2003 - 18:20
better mobo, better hdd? just thinking of things u could have...restart lately?
i have a powercolor. certainly microcenter would have something better than powercolor to displayOriginally posted by TheFilePirater@6 December 2003 - 18:20
better mobo, better hdd? just thinking of things u could have...restart lately?
hd has nothing to do with graphx performanceOriginally posted by TheFilePirater@6 December 2003 - 18:20
better mobo, better hdd? just thinking of things u could have...restart lately?
not trueOriginally posted by abu_has_the_power@6 December 2003 - 22:26
hd has nothing to do with graphx performance
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
not true [/b][/quote]Originally posted by 3rd gen noob+6 December 2003 - 18:27--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (3rd gen noob @ 6 December 2003 - 18:27)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-abu_has_the_power@6 December 2003 - 22:26
hd has nothing to do with graphx performance
ok. how does a harddrive haven anything to do with framerates?
besides, my hd isn't the best. it's a maxtor 120 gb. i'm pretty sure they had similar
well, when you're running the game (benchmark), the data to be rendered by the graphics card has to get there somehowOriginally posted by abu_has_the_power@6 December 2003 - 22:28
ok. how does a harddrive haven anything to do with framerates?
it gets there from the hard drive
thus the graphics performance is dependent on the hard drive
edit: clarification
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
well, when you're running the game (benchmark), the data to be rendered by the graphics card has to get there somehowOriginally posted by 3rd gen noob+6 December 2003 - 18:31--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (3rd gen noob @ 6 December 2003 - 18:31)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-abu_has_the_power@6 December 2003 - 22:28
ok. how does a harddrive haven anything to do with framerates?
it gets there from the hard drive
thus the graphics performance is dependent on the hard drive
edit: clarification [/b][/quote]
ok. good point. well, how much better is a maxtor 120 gb compared to their "top o line" display pc? certainly their hd is at least 7200 rpm. it's hard to find any hds lower than 7200 rpm nowadays
it's impossible to say with any real accuracy whether their hdd is faster or better than yours without the specs, however, if it's their top of the line drive, it should be pretty quick (either 8MB cache IDE or SCSI)Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@6 December 2003 - 22:33
ok. good point. well, how much better is a maxtor 120 gb compared to their "top o line" display pc? certainly their hd is at least 7200 rpm. it's hard to find any hds lower than 7200 rpm nowadays
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
or maybe some raptors in a raid
i suppose we can all dreamOriginally posted by john_malkie2010@6 December 2003 - 22:50
or maybe some raptors in a raid
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
what is that AA stuff and all that?
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
Bookmarks