Exactly, where's the clean version that is mentioned in the article.Originally posted by J'Pol+7 December 2003 - 16:38--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (J'Pol @ 7 December 2003 - 16:38)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by scribblec@7 December 2003 - 17:23
<!--QuoteBegin-J'Pol@7 December 2003 - 16:21
Forgive the obvious question, but if K+ is spyware and adware free, what's the problem with using it.
sharman doesn't like the idea that we are using a program which has no adverts
no adverts means no customers so adverts = money and if everyone is using lite then they get none and become unhappy
they are pulling out all stops to stop this program from actually staying afloat
i will upgrade to 2.6 but wheres the clean version
Is that from Sharman, if so what's the point. Surely they need the adverts for their business model to work, as you so rightly point out.The effects of this extermination is already taking place, as search times and connection times are deteriorating compared to K+ (the legitimate spyware/adware free version of Kazaa.)
I cannot understand why they would produce a spyware/adware free version. There must be something I am missing. [/b][/quote]
THEY WANT MONEY
MONEY DOES NOT GROW ON TREES
adverts equals money
more adverts more money
no adverts no money
capiece?
Bookmarks