Shareaza

[junkyardking]

Originally posted by muchspl2@9 December 2003 - 03:07
I would be very suprised if shereaza network took off

80,000 and climbing

[chinook_apache]

shareaza is atcually very fast for me... i use it to get bit torrent files...cant be asked with the bt program. the gnutella servers are pretty good and takes usually a good 2 mins for me to connect to all the servers i need to connect to.
speed wise very good.
i like the gui it is very simple and user friendly.
shareaza should also integrate the sig2dat as well since its got ed2k and .torrrent

[Amarjit]

Originally posted by muchspl2@9 December 2003 - 03:07
I would be very suprised if shereaza network took off

Firstly, Shareaza's premium network is G2, so why would it be taken off? It is IMO the best designed network; it's overhead is low, and there is a lack of degrading files. Lastly, Gnutella2 is decentralised, unlike crappy KL++, which is semi-decentralised.

[Mudvayne]

One thing is true there are less fakes and the music has better quality.

[Neo 721]

Shareaza apears to handle Bittorent downloads alot better than anything else, even faster than the official client.

[muchspl2]

Originally posted by Neo 721@9 December 2003 - 19:32
Shareaza apears to handle Bittorent downloads alot better than anything else, even faster than the official client.

its a trick, don't believe the speeds you see, very common mistake
its kb's not KB's

[Jay]

shareaza is faster that k-lite, when i'm using it for bittoret files.

[Cotton]

Shareaza Sucks ass.

[SingaBoiy]

Originally posted by Cotton@12 December 2003 - 03:25
Shareaza Sucks ass.

Shareaza kicks ass*
I hardly use k-lite anymore

[BullWinkle]

I think shareaza is great, can usually download a game in about 3 hours whereas it usually took me about a week with k-lite, add to this the fact that I have never had a corrupt download from shareaza so I never use k-lite anymore.