surely there must be something wrong with my setup if i only got a 980 in the benchmark test 3DMARK03.
is this what i should be getting on my geforce fx 5200?
my specs are all stated below.
surely there must be something wrong with my setup if i only got a 980 in the benchmark test 3DMARK03.
is this what i should be getting on my geforce fx 5200?
my specs are all stated below.
3d mark 03 is heavily dependent on the graphics card in the system
try 3d mark 2001 and see what you get in that...
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
No shit Sherlock.Originally posted by 3rd gen noob@8 December 2003 - 23:26
3d mark 03 is heavily dependent on the graphics card in the system
try 3d mark 2001 and see what you get in that...
Graphics card is all the 3D mark is testing.
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
No shit Sherlock.Originally posted by clocker+9 December 2003 - 05:30--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker @ 9 December 2003 - 05:30)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-3rd gen noob@8 December 2003 - 23:26
3d mark 03 is heavily dependent on the graphics card in the system
try 3d mark 2001 and see what you get in that...
Graphics card is all the 3D mark is testing. [/b][/quote]
at least the previous versions were more weighted
(click)
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
Athlon XP 2700+Originally posted by dray_02@9 December 2003 - 05:39
wot r ure specs 3rd gn noob?
512MB Corsair XMS3500 (2-2-2-5, 333MHz)
ASUS A7N8X-D
Tyan Radeon 9600 Pro (520/610)
120GB Western Digital 8MB cache HDD
80GB Seagate 2MB cache Hdd
52/24/52 Lite-On Cd-RW
420W Thermaltake W008R PSU
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
thats a nice setup, but can sum1 tell me if i should be expecting a higher result than that (because i need 2 upgrade my motherboard to an 8xAGP)
or is this the highest result i can expect from a geforce fx 5200
well, to put it into perspective, when i had my GeForce 3 Ti200 (exactly the same spec as above, except different gpu), i was getting in the region of 900-1000Originally posted by dray_02@9 December 2003 - 05:45
thats a nice setup, but can sum1 tell me if i should be expecting a higher result than that (because i need 2 upgrade my motherboard to an 8xAGP)
or is this the highest result i can expect from a geforce fx 5200
so your score seems pretty fair
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
surely the fx5200 128Mb is a way better card than the average Geforce 3 / 4 64Mb
you'd think so, but the truth is that the fx5200 is on a parallel with the low end GeForce 4MX series, albeit with true DX9 supportOriginally posted by dray_02@9 December 2003 - 05:48
surely the fx5200 128Mb is a way better card than the average Geforce 3 / 4
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
Bookmarks