Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 70

Thread: K-lite 2...............

  1. #51
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,377
    Originally posted by rafi_d+13 December 2003 - 12:27--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (rafi_d @ 13 December 2003 - 12:27)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Kunal@13 December 2003 - 10:08
    http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=87491
    Just noticed - that it is NOT supported on Win 98
    Well, too bad for me. [/b][/quote]
    yeh, i no that, did it give you a notification?

  2. File Sharing   -   #52
    Originally posted by Kunal+13 December 2003 - 12:30--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Kunal &#064; 13 December 2003 - 12:30)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    Originally posted by rafi_d@13 December 2003 - 12:27
    <!--QuoteBegin-Kunal

    Just noticed - that it is NOT supported on Win 98
    Well, too bad for me.
    yeh, i no that, did it give you a notification? [/b][/quote]
    Yes it did. Just make it&#39;s text more clear... say something like - runs on Win 2000 and above. (or build a win98 version and you can SAVE the error dialog...)

    "the program requires windows 5.0.2195 or later"

    I suggest you also write it near the download link...

  3. File Sharing   -   #53
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,377
    Thanks for that Rafi, still figuring out how to make it say &#39;needs windows 2000 or above to run&#39;

  4. File Sharing   -   #54
    Originally posted by jimmyboy@13 December 2003 - 09:24
    Once we are done testing,we will have a download link available, Hopefully tomorrow. We are also working on changing the toolbar icons,so far it&#39;s going great.
    so you&#39;re revamping the regular kazaa 2.6 in a KLK++ one. nice&#33; to make it popular you should use the same outlook (icons, menu&#39;s etc) as KLK++ cause many people are familiar with it.. so that&#39;s a big point to make it popular as also the name is important.. Lite is wellknown all over the world.. when you change you&#39;re program name to ultimate kazaa (or something) people will think &#39;what the hell is that&#39; but&#39;s that&#39;s not what you get when you keep &#39;lite&#39; in the name.. people know it and willing to test it.. so i like the idea KLR --&#62; Kazaa Lite Revolution this will people let know it&#39;s back&#33;

  5. File Sharing   -   #55
    Originally posted by rafi_d+13 December 2003 - 10:27--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (rafi_d @ 13 December 2003 - 10:27)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Kunal@13 December 2003 - 10:08
    http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=87491
    Just noticed - that it is NOT supported on Win 98
    Well, too bad for me. [/b][/quote]
    Why don&#39;t you just download a version of Windows XP then? Is this possible? i don&#39;t know, because my computer came with it pre-installed.

  6. File Sharing   -   #56
    Originally posted by Sparkle1984+13 December 2003 - 18:21--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Sparkle1984 &#064; 13 December 2003 - 18:21)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    Originally posted by rafi_d@13 December 2003 - 10:27
    <!--QuoteBegin-Kunal

    Just noticed - that it is NOT supported on Win 98
    Well, too bad for me.
    Why don&#39;t you just download a version of Windows XP then? Is this possible? i don&#39;t know, because my computer came with it pre-installed. [/b][/quote]

    Until now - I had no good reason to do it. I did not want to spend a lot of time on re-installing the many applications that are currently on my system. Also - on my weak PIII 450 MHZ - I was told XP/2000 might be too "heavy"...

    KL is also - not good enough reason... . So I can only hope that since many of the KL users are 98th - someone will think of us too, or we&#39;ll have to move to DietK and reduce the KL community significantly (yes, it is a threat... )

  7. File Sharing   -   #57
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,377
    win 2k would run fine on that machine (how much ram do you have?) and also if you get it get a version with sp3 and NOT sp4

  8. File Sharing   -   #58
    rafi d, i&#39;m running Win2k on p3 500MHz with 128 RAM and it&#39;s running smoothly. You can get Win2k with sp3 on emule. check sharereactor. Thought i&#39;d let you know.

    win 2k would run fine on that machine (how much ram do you have?) and also if you get it get a version with sp3 and NOT sp4
    What&#39;s wrong with sp4 ? I recently installed it. Did i f*ck up?

  9. File Sharing   -   #59
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,377
    Originally posted by restricted@14 December 2003 - 00:19
    What&#39;s wrong with sp4 ? I recently installed it. Did i f*ck up?
    It&#39;s buggy and is a few issues, ask ballamm he knows more

  10. File Sharing   -   #60
    aiight thanks. it just proves how microblows can never get something right

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •