Should Saddam Be...

[Sparkle1984]

Very well said J'pol. Your opinions on the subject are much more calm and well thought-out than all those from the hang'em and bang'em brigade!!

[Benno]

Originally posted by bigboab+15 December 2003 - 15:52--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bigboab &#064; 15 December 2003 - 15:52)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-tralalala@15 December 2003 - 14:46
he is the one and only leader in the world that used chemical weapons against innocent people since world war 2&#33;&#33;&#33;

What do you consider Agent Orange to be tralalala? [/b][/quote]
tralalala are you ignoring this post intentionally?

[j2k4]

As has been pointed out in many threads, the U.S. is totally responsible for creating Hussein in the first place, however I do not believe this in any way trumps the prerogative of the Iraqi people, therefore:

Saddam ought to be kept in U.S. custody until such time as an Iraqi authority exists to try him.

During this interim period, all measures and methods should be tried so as to extract every last shred of relevent information Saddam possesses.

The Iraqis should then try Saddam before the whole world, and whatever they decide as to his fate should be accepted by all.

The U.N., of course, should be encouraged to complain (albeit in vain) that they won&#39;t get a crack at him.

Then the Iraqis can make that decision, too.

The most important and salient concern in all of this is, however, to remember that the U.S. is to blame.

[Barbarossa]

Originally posted by j2k4@15 December 2003 - 16:03

During this interim period, all measures and methods should be tried so as to extract every last shred of relevent information Saddam possesses.

Does this include physical torture? In which case I&#39;d have to disagree

[muchspl2]

I say trail in Iraq, the 4 option is pointless, aren&#39;t they still trying milosevic ?

[TheDave]

take him to the hague, like anyone else would be

[tralalala]

me?? ignoring the thread?&#33; how did you reach that conclusion????

tralalala

[thewizeard]

Originally posted by tralalala@15 December 2003 - 17:30
me?? ignoring the thread?&#33; how did you reach that conclusion????

tralalala

You ignored this post...

http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=...ndpost&p=738180

edit: which was a reply to this post: http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=...ndpost&p=738173

[j2k4]

Originally posted by barbarossa+15 December 2003 - 13:10--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (barbarossa @ 15 December 2003 - 13:10)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-j2k4@15 December 2003 - 16:03

During this interim period, all measures and methods should be tried so as to extract every last shred of relevent information Saddam possesses.

Does this include physical torture? In which case I'd have to disagree [/b][/quote]
I wouldn't think that necessary, barbarossa.

Start with a little sodium pentathol, and go from there.

Although it sounds like his tongue is pretty loose already, judging from what we're hearing.

[tralalala]

oh nigel123... ill tell you why i ignored boabs posts... simply because i actually have no idea who agent orange is/was... : oops: :helpsmile: :confused: >_< and even - :&#39;(


tralalala