Your Ad Here Your Ad Here
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: 28 Day Later

  1. #1
    Ok so I just watched 28 days later, how bad was this movie, it promisses to be "scarry as hell" but doest deliver. The premis of the movie is scary, the beguining was promissing but once they get out of the tunel, it goes down hill from there.

    It borowed alot from the resident evil mythos and from the books, it could actualy be called "resident evil britain" if Dany doyle would have stuck with the survival horror partof the first 40 minutes of the movie it would have evolved great but the storyline with the horny soldiers just lost me

    D

    Final Rating from Draconos 4 /10 :egypt:

  2. Movies & TV   -   #2
    100%'s Avatar ╚════╩═╬════╝
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    13,671
    I love the occasional zombie movie but i must agree with you
    they say it was based upon the below movie which was
    very pre Resident Evil style

  3. Movies & TV   -   #3
    Rip The Jacker's Avatar Retired
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Age
    31
    Posts
    6,435
    They said 28 Days Later was
    The scariest movie of the year.
    Scariest movie of the year my ass. I thought this movie was very disappointing...

  4. Movies & TV   -   #4
    I Love Zombie, probably the scariest, creaapiest monsters around, I've never seen Omega Man, I do remember the original, last man on earth with Vincent Price, and I've read the book "I am Legend" (I am legend is actualy the original and omega man was a remake of the Price movie)

    I guess I can see the link, but 28 day later still sucked. I really happy I didnt DL it and burn it to DVD
    D

  5. Movies & TV   -   #5
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    726
    The movie wasn't scary due to the infected and such, it was more the mentallity that followed with seeing a deserted London, and infact Britain. It was only really meant to be scary in that sense for British folk, however still may not achieve. I didn't find it scary, but interesting and worth the watch. Just one thing, the movie I think was made before the resident evil movie? Of course, the game was out long before, but many sources say it is infact not inspired by.

    also closing note. It wasn't a zombie film! it didn't have one single zombie in it! the infected were not dead, just under control from the virus, hence the name Rage for it causing rage. The film just brought to light in the time of recent terror attacks how Britain might of coped should a major virus break out. The results showed a deserted London, a sight most have never seen! that is why it is scary, to see the fall of society and that not even the military can be trusted (go figure).

  6. Movies & TV   -   #6
    to that point I must say it was scary, to see the fall of the "Kingdom" and very True, there were no Zombie but Infected, but ... the Rage Virus changes them into what would traditionaly be called a zombie.

    I heared it was made like 4 years ago on a camcorder, It was made before Res evil but Res came out first. and the Resident evil books have been out since 97, I've read them all, and there is quite a bit bored from them.

    I think the consect of the film was awsom and scary, but it just didnt deliver its promise.

    and what was the whole "alternate ending scarier than the original" there was nothing scary about any of them.

    D

  7. Movies & TV   -   #7
    Personally I thought this movie sucked ass. If I had paid to see it then I would be suffering from some extreme rage myself.

  8. Movies & TV   -   #8
    Originally posted by KrackHead2k@18 December 2003 - 15:33
    They said 28 Days Later was
    The scariest movie of the year.
    Scariest movie of the year my ass. I thought this movie was very disappointing...
    It was dissapointing
    hello i am going HOME.......

  9. Movies & TV   -   #9
    yes the movie wud have bin top if the army had not bin in...

    sum of the special features on the DVD show a story board of the movie without the army, sud have kept it that way...

  10. Movies & TV   -   #10
    Poster
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    481
    oi the film did not have a hollywood budget of millions so what they done with the budget they had i thought was quite good. i thought the film was alright alot better than the rubbish thats been comming out of hollywood 4 da last few years.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •