Board Rules

[Rappy]

Originally posted by Benno@20 December 2003 - 17:00

2. Posts containing subject matter deemed grotesque, disturbing, obscene, malicious, or of a sexual nature may be edited or deleted. Images containing complete nudity are not allowed, and nude images in which the subject(s) are topless may only be posted in the Lounge area. There will be no racial, ethnic, or gender based insults or any other discriminatory comments or content.

Does this mean you see women as subjects?

interesting point

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by RapFan+20 December 2003 - 18:28--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (RapFan @ 20 December 2003 - 18:28)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Benno@20 December 2003 - 17:00

2. Posts containing subject matter deemed grotesque, disturbing, obscene, malicious, or of a sexual nature may be edited or deleted. Images containing complete nudity are not allowed, and nude images in which the subject(s) are topless may only be posted in the Lounge area. There will be no racial, ethnic, or gender based insults or any other discriminatory comments or content.

Does this mean you see women as subjects?

interesting point [/b][/quote]
There is no mention of women in that rule.

[Benno]

I have never seen topless pics of men or something else in the Lounge.
So what else could the subjects be?

[internet.news]

Originally posted by 7thElement@20 December 2003 - 16:08
Please have a look at our modified Board Rules :o

I do not agree with the part of Leeching -

I agree with it partly that sharing could not be commercialised&#33;

But as I cannot expect of everyone sharing I would not ban them cause their just humans - that is why I do not cancel Ppl sharing no files, but I am happy to see people uploading from me sharing some files ;)

All in all, this should be important that these rules should not be like laws they should be like something were new and old members can orientating themselves some guidelines ;)

[titey]

So you think it&#39;s ok to ENCOURAGE people to leech?

Or to make it EASIER for them to do so?

[Rappy]

lol people are still gonna leech with that rule or not

[Rappy]

Originally posted by J&#39;Pol+20 December 2003 - 18:34--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (J&#39;Pol @ 20 December 2003 - 18:34)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by RapFan@20 December 2003 - 18:28
<!--QuoteBegin-Benno

@20 December 2003 - 17:00

2. Posts containing subject matter deemed grotesque, disturbing, obscene, malicious, or of a sexual nature may be edited or deleted. Images containing complete nudity are not allowed, and nude images in which the subject(s) are topless may only be posted in the Lounge area. There will be no racial, ethnic, or gender based insults or any other discriminatory comments or content.

Does this mean you see women as subjects?

interesting point

There is no mention of women in that rule. [/b][/quote]
told ya people would find ways around the rules

[Jg427]

6. Posts that contain direct download links to copyrighted software, private ftp sites, serial numbers, warez sites, and hacking sites are prohibited. Posts directly or indirectly related to any of this information will be edited. Hacking discussions are strictly prohibited within the forum. Sig2dat quicklinks and hashes are NOT considered to be DDL, therefore allowed.

Ed2k hashes are not mentioned. They appear to be in the same catagory as Sig2dat quicklinks to me. Is this incorrect?

This question has not been answered as far as I know.
http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=88343

Jg427

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by Jg427@20 December 2003 - 22:59

6. Posts that contain direct download links to copyrighted software, private ftp sites, serial numbers, warez sites, and hacking sites are prohibited. Posts directly or indirectly related to any of this information will be edited. Hacking discussions are strictly prohibited within the forum. Sig2dat quicklinks and hashes are NOT considered to be DDL, therefore allowed.

Ed2k hashes are not mentioned. They appear to be in the same catagory as Sig2dat quicklinks to me. Is this incorrect?

This question has not been answered as far as I know.
http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=88343

Jg427

I agree with you - I think I have said it elsewhere.

[Jg427]

Originally posted by J&#39;Pol@20 December 2003 - 16:18


I agree with you - I think I have said it elsewhere.

Your post was in the thread I linked. No response from a mod. or admin. to it yet.

Jg427