The number of members has nothing to do with the server load when (for instance) changing usernames. It is the number of posts that causes the excess load - and we have a lot of posts.Originally posted by Lamsey+22 December 2003 - 00:31--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lamsey @ 22 December 2003 - 00:31)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by Nimdock@21 December 2003 - 22:10
<!--QuoteBegin-balamm@21 December 2003 - 18:57
I'd be very surprised if this forum actually has more than 500 members.
It might look real impressive having that number down there but how many have ever logged in more than once or twice?
Look at the online stats, average 100 users online. Best we ever saw was 400 and I think that was due to darker redirecting traffic here.
Even if you used an extremely conservative estimate of 2% of members online at any one time, you're looking at a total real membership of 5000.
The server load excuse just doesn't fly the same now does it?
I have to agree with balamm on this one.
I'm surprised that someone so 1337 as Balamm didn't know that. [/b][/quote]
That is not what you were saying earlier Liam.
Bookmarks