yep, my 9600 pro clocks up from 400/600 standard to 520/620Originally posted by adamp2p@23 December 2003 - 02:02
Regardless, you should get at least a 9600 pro. From what I have been reading, all three are great overclockers.![]()
yep, my 9600 pro clocks up from 400/600 standard to 520/620Originally posted by adamp2p@23 December 2003 - 02:02
Regardless, you should get at least a 9600 pro. From what I have been reading, all three are great overclockers.![]()
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
Ok well the 9500Pro beats both the 9600Pro and 9600XT hands down. They are all about the same price, so I'm thinking I should go with the 9500Pro...DUH lol
Damn 3rd gen I bet your card can beat the 9500Pro...lol I wonder if I can overclock that thing as much as you overclocked urs..
Which would yall choose?
Radeon 9500Pro 128MB, or
Radeon 9600XT 256MB? They are the same price.
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
i'd go for the 9600xt personally, if only for half life 2 freeOriginally posted by bigdawgfoxx@23 December 2003 - 02:12
Radeon 9500Pro 128MB, or
Radeon 9600XT 256MB? They are the same price.
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
Well the 9500Pro has TWICE the pipelines..will that make alot of diff in picture? And I dont really think i want to DOWNLOAD () HL2...I would take the hardcopy tho.
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
the benchmarks should tell you all you need to know about thatOriginally posted by bigdawgfoxx@23 December 2003 - 02:17
Well the 9500Pro has TWICE the pipelines..will that make alot of diff in picture?![]()
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
Lol ok well then the 9500Pro wins bigtime. And the 9600XT is BLACK..which is tight but I want a red ATI card lol. And it has a SMALL heatsink and SMALL fan..Not good for overclocking at ALL...I think the 9500Pro will be much more overclockable.
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
Here we go again, big dawg...![]()
The 256 version of the XT has slower rams. The 9500 pro will be an overall better card for the money (if you can still get your hands on it).
Edit: why do you care what color the freaking card is?
Cuz im a picky mother fucking son of a bitch...and if im getting an ATI the motherfuckers gona be RED i tell you...I will get the 9500Pro bitches.
IM ORDERING IT....OK WITH EVERYONE?
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
http://www.tech-report.com/reviews/2003q4/...xt/index.x?pg=1
tsk tsk sry to let ya down......nvidia all the way![]()
Originally posted by DWk@23 December 2003 - 04:36
http://www.tech-report.com/reviews/2003q4/...xt/index.x?pg=1
tsk tsk sry to let ya down......nvidia all the way![]()
![]()
Bookmarks