Ok This Is My Current System

[scribblec]

OS Name Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Build 2600
OS Manufacturer Microsoft Corporation
System Name
System Manufacturer MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD
System Model 8366-8233
System Type X86-based PC
Processor x86 Family 6 Model 6 Stepping 2 AuthenticAMD ~1665 Mhz
BIOS Version/Date Award Software International, Inc. 6.00 PG, 14/05/2002
SMBIOS Version 2.2
Windows Directory C:\WINDOWS
System Directory C:\WINDOWS\System32
Boot Device \Device\HarddiskVolume1
Locale
Hardware Abstraction Layer Version = "5.1.2600.1106 (xpsp1.020828-1920)"
User Name
Time Zone GMT Standard Time
Total Physical Memory 512.00 MB
Available Physical Memory 249.02 MB
Total Virtual Memory 1.72 GB
Available Virtual Memory 1.23 GB
Page File Space 1.22 GB
Page File C:\pagefile.sys



i want to upgrade my ram to about 1024mb
i want a better graphics card
i want more ghz

how much would these cost and how easy is it to install

[camille]

Well, depends upon the brand you're going to use.

[scribblec]

Originally posted by camille@25 December 2003 - 22:56
Well, depends upon the brand you're going to use.

well i wouldnt mind the latest athlon

[camille]

Athlon
A Pentium-compatible CPU chip from AMD. The first models were introduced as Pentium III-class CPUs in 1999 with clock speeds from 500MHz to 650MHz and a 200MHz system bus. Ask BOT?

[camille]

Sorry, Lamsey instead.

[_John_Lennon_]

Scribb isnt that an 1800+ that you have already?

[bigdawgfoxx]

Your system looks pretty..GOOD to me..not as good as mine of course but good haha. I dont know why you would want to upgrade anything than the Graphics card. Just dont upgrade anything else and spend the money on one hell of a graphics card. I would reccomend the 9700Pro





WOW isnt THIS like the biggest fucking rip off? OMG on benchmarks it didnt even beat the regular 3.2 by hardly ANY..and it cost over $1000

[DWk]

Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@25 December 2003 - 17:48
I would reccomend the 9700Pro

you shouldnt recommend stuff that you dont even HAVE currently....not to mention only after the benchies....

WOW isnt THIS like the biggest fucking rip off?  OMG on benchmarks it didnt even beat the regular 3.2 by hardly ANY..and it cost over $1000

no its not a ripoff... it has a feckin 2mb l3 cache.... regular computers have only 512kb on an l2......

[scribblec]

its a 2000+ and yea where can i get the cheapest bestest graphics card

[bigdawgfoxx]

Originally posted by DWk+25 December 2003 - 18:51--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (DWk @ 25 December 2003 - 18:51)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-bigdawgfoxx@25 December 2003 - 17:48
I would reccomend the 9700Pro

you shouldnt recommend stuff that you dont even HAVE currently....not to mention only after the benchies....

WOW isnt THIS like the biggest fucking rip off? OMG on benchmarks it didnt even beat the regular 3.2 by hardly ANY..and it cost over &#036;1000

no its not a ripoff... it has a feckin 2mb l3 cache.... regular computers have only 512kb on an l2...... [/b][/quote]
ok wtf...everyone knows that a 9700Pro for &#036;220 is one fucking awesome deal and if he wants a good one he can get that. And you dont fucking need that much of a cache...on benchmarks it didnt show very much improvment over the regular 3.2 with 512Kb of cache..so yeah..rip