Don't spend any more money on that old type of system.
Look at what you can get to start building a newer system and put the money towards that instead.
Don't spend any more money on that old type of system.
Look at what you can get to start building a newer system and put the money towards that instead.
my ram was £153 (~$250 U.S.) when i got it, for a single 512MB stick of Corsair XMS3502Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@27 December 2003 - 02:17
not when you have $140ram...I could upgrade my CPU for cheaper..hahahaha
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
u huh riiiiiiiiiiightOriginally posted by Sparsely@26 December 2003 - 23:10
sparsely goes and stands on the "abandon that friggin piece of crap" side.
meh mind as well that mofo piece of shizzle should be dunked and a new one should be purchased cuz its all good you know and ram shouldnt be purchased for that pos u kno and not only that you should build the new system urself cuz its fun and all that bullshit and well, lifes meant to be fun so while ur at it go to google and search for mini-itx systems cuz those damned systems are kickass especially the ones which are shoved into power supplies and while ur at it you can build 1 in ur subwoofer and in ur printer and in your TV and in your VCR and in your body (cuz it'd fit) and mind as well in your PC thats running rite now and maybe even into your jacket and it would work using solar panels and would only be good for book reports and college crap and elementary school crap and...
im just rambling arent I?
my ram was £153 (~$250 U.S.) when i got it, for a single 512MB stick of Corsair XMS3502 [/b][/quote]Originally posted by 3rd gen noob+26 December 2003 - 21:28--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (3rd gen noob @ 26 December 2003 - 21:28)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-bigdawgfoxx@27 December 2003 - 02:17
not when you have $140ram...I could upgrade my CPU for cheaper..hahahaha
DAMN...is it lowlatency at least?? lol You could get a gig now for that
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
well, it runs 2-2-2-5 at 333MHz, so i'm pretty pleased with itOriginally posted by bigdawgfoxx@27 December 2003 - 03:28
DAMN...is it lowlatency at least?? lol You could get a gig now for that
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>
you'd prolly get more of a speed-up just by falling back to Win98 SE or WinME rather than using XP.Originally posted by Ramones53rd3rd@26 December 2003 - 16:23
I run Windows Xp Pro with a 334MHz Processor and 160 Mb of Ram and a 4 gig hardrive.
on a brand new computer, the speed difference between 98 and XP is pretty negligible... but on an old comp like the one you described, XP would be noticeably sluggish compared to 98.
I love my computer. It's a 400mhz Celeron, with 256MB of PC100 SDRAM, a 40 GIG harddrive, and Windows 98 SE. It' a 5 year old Gateway that I've slowly upgraded. It's a lot faster than my new computer with XP, which doesn't make sense to me. I like 98SE a lot better than XP though.
You can never have too much ram
You problely have too much crap running at once. try making sure you don't have too much stuff running at startupIt's a lot faster than my new computer with XP, which doesn't make sense to me.
try using this Startup Control Panel
and this StartupMonitor
Bookmarks