Your Ad Here Your Ad Here
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37

Thread: Is This Pc Worth The Money?

  1. #1
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    44
    Western Digital Caviar SE 250GB UIDE 100 7200rpm 8mb Cache.
    Intel Pentium 4 2.8ghz 800FSB SKT478 512k Cache.
    Sapphire Radeon 9600XT Atlantis 256M DDR AGP, DVI-I, TV-Out.
    P4C800 SKT478 SATA 8x AGP 800 FSB DDR400 Memory, Sound,LAN Intel Hyper-Threading.
    Xaser III SuperTower ATX Black with Window.
    DDR-DIMM PC3200 1024MB DDR CL2.5 Memory 184-P.
    Sony 16x40 IDE Internal DVD Drive.
    Creative SB Live! Player 5.1 Soundcard w/Wavetable.
    Optorite 52x24x52x IDE DRIVE.
    QTEC 400 Watt PSU P4 ready Twin Fan.
    Round IDE Cable ATA100 60cm in Blue X 2.
    12" Blue Dual Cold Cathode Kit.
    Round Floppy Cable 60cm in Blue.

    846.11 / $1,498.46

    Well what do you think?

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #2
    atiVidia's Avatar ^would've been cool.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,551
    Originally posted by EoN@27 December 2003 - 03:19
    Western Digital Caviar SE 250GB UIDE 100 7200rpm 8mb Cache.
    Intel Pentium 4 2.8ghz 800FSB SKT478 512k Cache.
    Sapphire Radeon 9600XT Atlantis 256M DDR AGP, DVI-I, TV-Out.
    P4C800 SKT478 SATA 8x AGP 800 FSB DDR400 Memory, Sound,LAN Intel Hyper-Threading.
    Xaser III SuperTower ATX Black with Window.
    DDR-DIMM PC3200 1024MB DDR CL2.5 Memory 184-P.
    Sony 16x40 IDE Internal DVD Drive.
    Creative SB Live! Player 5.1 Soundcard w/Wavetable.
    Optorite 52x24x52x IDE DRIVE.
    QTEC 400 Watt PSU P4 ready Twin Fan.
    Round IDE Cable ATA100 60cm in Blue X 2.
    12" Blue Dual Cold Cathode Kit.
    Round Floppy Cable 60cm in Blue.

    846.11 / $1,498.46

    Well what do you think?
    i can build one better for less than that.

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #3
    abu_has_the_power's Avatar I have cool stars
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    6,503
    the 9600xt is horrible for that price. the hd is ok. the processor needs to be at least 3.2

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #4
    bigdawgfoxx's Avatar Big Dawg
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    29
    Posts
    3,833
    Thats one hell of a system. The graphics card could be a 9700 or 9800 series, but the 9600XT is very good also. I think 2.8Ghz would be fine, but that system is pretty high. You could build one yourself for much cheaper I'm sure.
    [SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
    1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
    HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #5
    Lick My Lovepump
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Age
    15
    Posts
    2,698
    Will it do what you want it to do?

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #6
    Ex-member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    5,529
    Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@27 December 2003 - 14:56
    the 9600xt is horrible for that price. the hd is ok. the processor needs to be at least 3.2
    Yeah, because that would make such a big difference over a 2.8GHz processor. It would certainly justify the massive increase in price.



    [/sarcasm]

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #7
    bigdawgfoxx's Avatar Big Dawg
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    29
    Posts
    3,833
    lol yeah I agree. 2.8Ghz should be fine. 3 if you want more, but the 3.2 is so exspensive, because its the top product in the line of chips
    [SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
    1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
    HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #8
    abu_has_the_power's Avatar I have cool stars
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    6,503
    Originally posted by Lamsey+27 December 2003 - 12:07--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lamsey @ 27 December 2003 - 12:07)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-abu_has_the_power@27 December 2003 - 14:56
    the 9600xt is horrible for that price. the hd is ok. the processor needs to be at least 3.2
    Yeah, because that would make such a big difference over a 2.8GHz processor. It would certainly justify the massive increase in price.



    [/sarcasm] [/b][/quote]
    ok. maybe the 3.2 is a bit rash. but the 9600xt is not good

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #9
    muchspl2
    Guest
    a simple answer to the title is no, its not worth the money
    build one for less

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #10
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,388
    Originally posted by muchspl2@27 December 2003 - 10:54
    a simple answer to the title is no, its not worth the money
    build one for less
    Actually, the simple answer would be "What do you think? It&#39;s your money..."
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •