I run NFSU demo...ugh...at 1280X1024 with 4XAA and 16XAF, and it runs flawlessly with all details on highest setting. Damn I love how that game looks.
I run NFSU demo...ugh...at 1280X1024 with 4XAA and 16XAF, and it runs flawlessly with all details on highest setting. Damn I love how that game looks.
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
i think it runs the same as yours with an fx5600 or 5200 ultra
the game isnt that graphic-demanding, even when the graphics are stunning.....
I heard that it was very graphicly demanding..and damnn it look so good. Oh well, whats some really demanding graphic games?
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
uhhh i would say big scenarios with lots of evil guys.... this mostly means like FPS games or something...Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@2 January 2004 - 09:48
I heard that it was very graphicly demanding..and damnn it look so good. Oh well, whats some really demanding graphic games?
oh and fyi....graphic-demanding doesnt mean it has great gfx...but merely it needs a good gfx renderer...
Halo is nearly unplayable on the best cards with AA and AF.
why's that?Originally posted by Mad Cat@2 January 2004 - 12:53
Halo is nearly unplayable on the best cards with AA and AF.
i was bustin out with it on my mx440
tuff game, btw
Halo was not "tuff" i beat it over the weekend....its a little too easy when you have a shotgun in your hand
halo? hmmm but i play games in hard mode.... could that be it? tsk tskOriginally posted by Mr. Elmo@2 January 2004 - 13:29
Halo was not "tuff" i beat it over the weekend....its a little too easy when you have a shotgun in your hand
Bookmarks