did i say the same as you two?
i cant understand my own typing
did i say the same as you two?
i cant understand my own typing
Just look at the evidence, the wave of "old members" leaving is to much to be coincidence, theres something more devious going on here, something very suspicious indeed.Originally posted by noname12+1 January 2004 - 23:22--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (noname12 @ 1 January 2004 - 23:22)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by scribblec@1 January 2004 - 23:19
<!--QuoteBegin-noname12@1 January 2004 - 23:13
Meh, I still stick by my conspiracy theory, most logical thing yet
everythings a conspiracy to you
Good thing I took those KGB lessons. I'm telling you some members are staging a coup. Just like when they tried to over-throw lamsey. [/b][/quote]
next ill be leaving..................
next ill be leaving..................Originally posted by scribblec+1 January 2004 - 22:23--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (scribblec @ 1 January 2004 - 22:23)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by noname12@1 January 2004 - 23:22
Originally posted by scribblec@1 January 2004 - 23:19
<!--QuoteBegin-noname12@1 January 2004 - 23:13
Meh, I still stick by my conspiracy theory, most logical thing yet
everythings a conspiracy to you
Just look at the evidence, the wave of "old members" leaving is to much to be coincidence, theres something more devious going on here, something very suspicious indeed.
Good thing I took those KGB lessons. I'm telling you some members are staging a coup. Just like when they tried to over-throw lamsey.
[/b][/quote]
bye then
Let me help you pack, I have a bus ticket already purchased.
Aren't we in the trust tree, thingey?
Nah, wait a little I'll be going in a weeks time, I'll need you to flame me then so I can be part of the drama queen train.Originally posted by scribblec@1 January 2004 - 23:23
next ill be leaving..................
See above. I will be using amphibian similies in the future and concede you the fowls [/b][/quote]Originally posted by hobbes+2 January 2004 - 00:21--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (hobbes @ 2 January 2004 - 00:21)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-J'Pol@2 January 2004 - 00:17
It scares me that we both used the aquatic fowl simile.
Thank you sir, I appreciate the courtesy.
Perhaps you have confused some of the chaps with your similies tho' . It is traditional to use one fewer vowels. Given that there is only on e in the word, I tend to omit an i. Even when pluralising.
Thank you sir, I appreciate the courtesy.Originally posted by J'Pol+2 January 2004 - 00:30--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (J'Pol @ 2 January 2004 - 00:30)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by hobbes@2 January 2004 - 00:21
<!--QuoteBegin-J'Pol@2 January 2004 - 00:17
It scares me that we both used the aquatic fowl simile.
See above. I will be using amphibian similies in the future and concede you the fowls
Perhaps you have confused some of the chaps with your similies tho' . It is traditional to use one fewer vowels. Given that there is only on e in the word, I tend to omit an i. Even when pluralising.[/b][/quote]
As you told me before, we must accept that language is evolving. Just like ignoring the subjunctive mood, in the future, as language evolves, we will pointlessly deviate from acceptable grammar simply because of ignorance and throw "i"s around, as we please.
Jpol give us some interesting topics to talk about, that is not my forte.
Aren't we in the trust tree, thingey?
Thank you sir, I appreciate the courtesy.Originally posted by J'Pol+1 January 2004 - 23:30--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (J'Pol @ 1 January 2004 - 23:30)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by hobbes@2 January 2004 - 00:21
<!--QuoteBegin-J'Pol@2 January 2004 - 00:17
It scares me that we both used the aquatic fowl simile.
See above. I will be using amphibian similies in the future and concede you the fowls
Perhaps you have confused some of the chaps with your similies tho' . It is traditional to use one fewer vowels. Given that there is only on e in the word, I tend to omit an i. Even when pluralising. [/b][/quote]
wait. i said the same as you but didnt similieise it, i think anyway. i failed english, more of a maths and science guy meself
It's all piss of an elephants srotum sac to me!
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:red'>Mr Hand's Busy Right Now! So Talk To Mr FOOKIN FINGER!!!!</span></span>
shirley you mean scrotum?Originally posted by fugley@6 January 2004 - 00:43
It's all piss of an elephants srotum sac to me!
Bookmarks