-
-
-
01-07-2004, 06:45 PM
The Drawing Room -
#2
Poster
This is what I believe bujub22's dead link is referring to.
http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/newssentinel/.../printstory.jsp
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/elecialotto1.html
If the person who lost the ticket really had it there finger prints or some of there DNA should be on it and that much cash would justify expensive laboratory analysis, but only the person who bought it knows where the ticket was bought along with the lottery agency.
-
-
01-08-2004, 08:04 PM
The Drawing Room -
#3
THE GREAT
-
-
01-09-2004, 10:23 PM
The Drawing Room -
#4
Poster
-
-
01-09-2004, 10:29 PM
The Drawing Room -
#5
THE GREAT
-
-
01-10-2004, 03:35 AM
The Drawing Room -
#6
Poster
-
-
01-10-2004, 12:03 PM
The Drawing Room -
#7
-
-
01-10-2004, 12:09 PM
The Drawing Room -
#8
The thing about all her numbers being family-related aren't completely true.
Five of the numbers were successfully identified as being related to family, though in no particular order. When asked about 49, she replied that her husband turned 49 this year.
When questioned, her husband said that he was 44 - He turns 45 this year
-
-
01-10-2004, 06:39 PM
The Drawing Room -
#9
Poster
I wonder if the real winner picked those numbers or just asked the computer to, the losers so dumb you have about as good of a chance at ripping off the lottery as getting away with robing a bank.
-
-
01-10-2004, 06:45 PM
The Drawing Room -
#10
Smoke weed everyday
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks