Will Your Firewall Stop This?

[CPU1]

what are the other two

[3223]

YES!! im safe woth ZA now. thanks!

[Ynhockey]

The ZA way seemed to work for me as well, but it's too bothersome... i mean, i'd hate to have to allow/block programs again and again each time they try to access the internet (that's how it works with the high security setting)... i feel unsafe

[DVD PIRATE III]

well its safer than having a trojan like this access the net..id rather take the time and energy to make a couple of extra clicks with my mouse than be to lazy and lose out big time in the long run...
might as well uninstall it..if you cant let it do its job , then its pointless having it

A lot of people are missing the point here...if youve allowed say for instance internet Explorer access to the net and some trojan youve got hijacks IE, then your firewall is gonna let it out because youve allowed IE access to the net..
basically you just got OWNED if that happens

[dudevenezuela]

FAILED
Sygate Personal Firewall version 5.5 build 2516

[DVD PIRATE III]

Originally posted by cpumaster1@11 January 2004 - 10:37
what are the other two

CPUMaster...Its me "Skank"..what firewall are you using?

[dudevenezuela]

Passed









After chosing "Block All"

[Mïcrösöül°V³]

Norton internet security 2003, failed, failed, failed

[leftism]

Sorry for going slightly OT but does anyone know if the same principle would work with linux? I mean DLL's are the same as shared libraries right? Can you load/unload shared libraries at runtime with linux?

I suspect this issue is really more of a problem with the windows architecture but it would be 'interesting' if this attack worked with linux as well.

[DVD PIRATE III]

Who wants to check there anti-virus/anti-trojan scanners?...go to this thread if ya not afraid...lol

http://klboard.ath.cx/index.php?showtopic=93194&hl=

here come some more failures...lol

as for linux Im not sure but id say no off the top off my head , but then again..ill give it a test this evening on a linux comp