Check our registered dates mate. Done that? Ok, now who is the "noob"?
Oh and reported of course.
Check our registered dates mate. Done that? Ok, now who is the "noob"?
Oh and reported of course.
btw, learn something. if u post personal shit, be prepared to calmly accept opinions on it, because trying to FORCE PEOPLE into SUBMISSION wont help you at allOriginally posted by 1234@14 January 2004 - 21:55
He chose to be offensive, he must learn there are repercussions. You might not have found it offensive, but that is utterly unimportant.
Yep I will report him for board violations.
I am aware you reported me, though I am also aware of whyLets see who's report is taken more seriously.
toe one with the title of "Newcomer" (being you, 1234) in his member title, or being the one with only 1 starOriginally posted by 1234@14 January 2004 - 22:00
Check our registered dates mate. Done that? Ok, now who is the "noob"?
Oh and reported of course.
post wise, you are a damned noob. learn, my friend
have a nice day
(btw the mods have been informed to close this topic)
GCNaddict proves beyond all reasonable doubt that there is no correlation between the number of stars next to your name and your intelligence
Dont bother replying to him 1234, he clearly took leave of his senses quite some time ago.![]()
I wonder though.. if someone on this board said that one of their relatives died in the WTC and I accused them of "adopted victimhood", would the response be the same?
If I didnt have certain standards, below which I refuse to drop, I might be tempted to test that theory out.
Opinions? Opinions are fine, but calling someone's grief over their loss an "adopted" affectation is not opinion - it is intended to be insulting. Now if you can find anything in my posts that appear to back his claims, I'd be more than happy to discuss it.
As for "forcing" people, I am not a mod. All I can do is ask a mod to review a post and see if it does indeed breach board rules. Their decision, not mine.
Btw sorry if my text is a bit dull, as I am obviously not as 1337 as you![]()
So, no matter how much I respect and support your right to express your opinion, mine remains unimportant. Fair enough, freedom of expression.Originally posted by 1234@14 January 2004 - 22:55
He chose to be offensive, he must learn there are repercussions. You might not have found it offensive, but that is utterly unimportant.
Yep I will report him for board violations.
I am aware you reported me, though I am also aware of whyLets see who's report is taken more seriously.
I reported you for ridiculing me in a thread which, to the best of my recollection I had not even posted in. Only going to prove that you are motivated by grudge and vendetta, rather than the issue being debated.
Why should one person's report be taken more seriously than another's. We are all entitled to feel aggrieved at the actions of others. However I agree, the mods and if necessary admin will adjudicate on who is behaving in a reasonable manner.
Again quoting myself, it is all there for people to read and make up their own minds about.
Puerile insult, excellent if predictable tactic.Originally posted by leftism@14 January 2004 - 23:07
GCNaddict proves beyond all reasonable doubt that there is no correlation between the number of stars next to your name and your intelligence
Some people never disappoint.
That is how I read it.
And I should have read more, I found the twist.
edited because I was ignorant
Aren't we in the trust tree, thingey?
Originally posted by J'Pol+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (J'Pol)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Puerile insult, excellent if predictable tactic.
Some people never disappoint. [/b]
Your showing your bias here J'Pol.
If you really want to go on a mission judging peoples posts I would have thought that GCNAddicts would have been a good place to start
But dont pretend your judging my post without bias because your clearly not applying these 'standards' equally to all.
@hobbes I think 1234 covered that issue.
<!--QuoteBegin-1234
You said people who oppose the death penalty not on religious, theological or on the grounds it's not brutal enough have mushy brains. I oppose the death penalty for none of those reasons, therefore you said my brain was "mushy". [/quote]
Your showing your bias here J'Pol.Originally posted by leftism+14 January 2004 - 23:50--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (leftism @ 14 January 2004 - 23:50)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-J'Pol
Puerile insult, excellent if predictable tactic.
Some people never disappoint.
If you really want to go on a mission judging peoples posts I would have thought that GCNAddicts would have been a good place to start
But dont pretend your judging my post without bias because your clearly not applying these 'standards' equally to all.[/b][/quote]
You are entirely correct. I am biased against puerile insults. You are also correct that I apply these standards as I see fit. Thanks for pointing these things out, people may not have noticed them in my 7 quadzillion previous efforts.
Really funny the part about judging other peoples posts tho'. Bit of a pot calling the kettle black thing.
Oh, sorry meant to say, do you disagree it was a puerile insult. You never said, or perhaps I didn't pick it up, what with the 76 year old brain getting mushy.
Bookmarks