Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Nvidia Geforce Vs. Ati Radeon

  1. #11
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Guatemala
    Posts
    4,044
    Excuse me..... faster? What do you mean a card is faster? So cards can run? Oh you mean like ATI's have NOS and nVidia's don't? How much HP does each have?

    So ATI's would win in a Drag race?

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #12
    Livy's Avatar Simpleton
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,013
    i have an hightech ati radeon 9200se 128mb and im pretty happy, not done much gaming, its a new pc. and pretty busy at the mo, but it can run simpsons hit and run perfectly on default settings, and it looks pretty cheap, i got mine for around £37

    edit: also i think there may have been a prob with the drivers that came with it or something, as the card crashed on my dad, but nothings happedned since i updated the drivers to the latest ones.

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #13
    @DWk
    Yep... ATI cards have more HP than nVidia cards... But the ATI drivers are crappy, so you can't play all games, or with bugs, so you have to wait till they release a bug-fix. That's ATI biggest prob now. The hardware itself is exelent

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #14
    Lick My Lovepump
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Age
    21
    Posts
    2,657
    Originally posted by StyleWarz@13 January 2004 - 17:44
    @DWk
    Yep... ATI cards have more HP than nVidia cards... But the ATI drivers are crappy, so you can't play all games, or with bugs, so you have to wait till they release a bug-fix. That's ATI biggest prob now. The hardware itself is exelent
    I've never had problems with any of my ATi cards in any games, and gaming is the number one use of my PC. My 9500 even played MGS2 perfectly before they released the ATi patch.

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #15
    i got the 3fx voodoo 6 it does u canot fuck with it

    its baaaaad

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #16
    Originally posted by Mad Cat+13 January 2004 - 17:51--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mad Cat @ 13 January 2004 - 17:51)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-StyleWarz@13 January 2004 - 17:44
    @DWk
    Yep... ATI cards have more HP than nVidia cards... But the ATI drivers are crappy, so you can&#39;t play all games, or with bugs, so you have to wait till they release a bug-fix. That&#39;s ATI biggest prob now. The hardware itself is exelent&nbsp;
    I&#39;ve never had problems with any of my ATi cards in any games, and gaming is the number one use of my PC. My 9500 even played MGS2 perfectly before they released the ATi patch. [/b][/quote]
    I&#39;m happy for you... But more than 7 million games had to wait 2 weeks before ATI release a bug-fix for Call Of Duty before they were able to play...

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #17
    ati alwayes all the way

    its faster comparitively and lighter on the pocket

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #18
    Poster
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    47
    Posts
    759
    I think the best would be if nVidia would colaborate with ATI.That would make a perfect harmony of speed & performance

    I can almost see it:
    nVidia + ATI = nVidi ATI-Force 9900 FX 512 MB RDRAM

    I know , i know ... I&#39;m crazy B)


  9. Software & Hardware   -   #19
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Guatemala
    Posts
    4,044
    Originally posted by StyleWarz@13 January 2004 - 10:44
    @DWk
    Yep... ATI cards have more HP than nVidia cards... But the ATI drivers are crappy, so you can&#39;t play all games, or with bugs, so you have to wait till they release a bug-fix. That&#39;s ATI biggest prob now. The hardware itself is exelent
    WTF are you talking about? HP=HorsePower

    Are you actually saying that an ATI card has more HORSEPOWER than an nVidia card?

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #20
    GCNaddict's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    riiiiight.
    Posts
    267
    Originally posted by DWk+13 January 2004 - 18:26--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (DWk &#064; 13 January 2004 - 18:26)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-StyleWarz@13 January 2004 - 10:44
    @DWk
    Yep... ATI cards have more HP than nVidia cards... But the ATI drivers are crappy, so you can&#39;t play all games, or with bugs, so you have to wait till they release a bug-fix. That&#39;s ATI biggest prob now. The hardware itself is exelent
    WTF are you talking about? HP=HorsePower

    Are you actually saying that an ATI card has more HORSEPOWER than an nVidia card? [/b][/quote]
    @ Stylewarz: its the other way around

    @ DWK: i agree with u

    an interesting point to make: as resolutions get higher (with ALL games) fsaa and asf rates favor nVidia rather than ATI. Why? cuz nVidia has the horsies to pull the high rates off&#33;

    the core in the nVidia chips is not flawed: they just have more resources devoted to speed than to fsaa+asf

    to add to the mystical-ness of life: 2xQ fsaa on the nVidia chips gives EXACTLY THE SAME OUTPUT as standard 4x&#33; im surprised to see that they dont ude this method of ASF in their benchmarks

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •