Nforce2 Chipsets

[_John_Lennon_]

Originally posted by DarthInsinuate@31 January 2004 - 13:37
reviews prove Nforce2 is faster, marginally - but, they're highly rated, and the KT400 has issues with DDR400, which is probably why they're popular

I thought the KT600 Was on comparison level with the Nforce chipsets, not the 400.

[bigdawgfoxx]

I would definently get nForce 2. Works great with my Radeon 9700Pro.

[DWk]

Originally posted by _John_Lennon_+31 January 2004 - 11:52--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (_John_Lennon_ @ 31 January 2004 - 11:52)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-DarthInsinuate@31 January 2004 - 13:37
reviews prove Nforce2 is faster, marginally - but, they&#39;re highly rated, and the KT400 has issues with DDR400, which is probably why they&#39;re popular

I thought the KT600 Was on comparison level with the Nforce chipsets, not the 400. [/b][/quote]
John, check em out if you have time I don&#39;t

http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherb...814/index.html

http://www.tomshardware.com/motherbo...417/index.html

http://www20.tomshardware.com/motherboard/...1boards-01.html

http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherb...007/index.html

http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/20030701..._tuning-02.html

The last one has some info....didn&#39;t bother to look at it...

Bye

[B_U_B_B_A]

the only problem is that the agb bus has to be set to 66mhz in the bios when u r overclocking but as long as u do that then u have no problems