Did You read 7th first post?
BOT
Did You read 7th first post?
BOT
I suppose this new forum procedure covers linking pictures in our posts as well?....
like normal jpegs,gifs etc?..if it does im disappointed![]()
Wouldnt it be easier to just ban those sort of signatures?..I know 2 other forums, one just as big if not bigger than k-lite forum that employs the banning of those ISP signatures etcOriginally posted by 7thElement@2 February 2004 - 06:16
Reason for this step is that many members use dynamic signatures which fetch a user information such as browser version, OS version, IP address and more.
Hopefully this step will help to offer our members a better privacy environment.
You cannot ban it by extension. The best example would be this image http://www.danasoft.com/vipersig.jpg which is generated on-fly.
The only way to stop people to collect user information is by allowing our members to upload their sigs / avatars here.
No I dont think so. Its only related to having it in sigs.Originally posted by Java Boy@2 February 2004 - 00:19
I suppose this new forum procedure covers linking pictures in our posts as well?....
like normal jpegs,gifs etc?..if it does im disappointed![]()
<span style='color:black'> I am a part of all that I have met - Lord Tennyson</span>
<span style='color:blue'>Try not to let your mind wander...it is too small and fragile to be out by itself</span>
I didn't have a sig just links to kvcd
this sucks :confused:
Hey this is a really good idea![]()
Wont the extra storage and BW be a problem though ?![]()
We got 7thOriginally posted by Evil Gemini@2 February 2004 - 13:27
Wont the extra storage and BW be a problem though ?![]()
BOT
would be great if the picture was checked on the filesizes (max 495x150 Pixels)
Bookmarks