Fact's

[DarthInsinuate]

humans are not the only species capable of becoming homosexual, it is known to occur all over the animal kingdom

[j2k4]

Originally posted by Azzz+9 February 2004 - 14:44--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Azzz &#064; 9 February 2004 - 14:44)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by j2k4@9 February 2004 - 17:33

Originally posted by Azzz@9 February 2004 - 14:25
<!--QuoteBegin-danb

@9 February 2004 - 17:23
I won&#39;t tell people Azzz is short for Astrid


Whoops naughty me

Indeed

Fact:

This thread is infested with gurlz (homo erectus eroticus).

Is nothing sacred?

i have no idea what you mean FACT[/b][/quote]
You (Astrid) and danb (Danielle) have revealed yourselves to be of the female persuasion, yes?

Hence the fact of your having infested (no offense intended) this thread.

I was merely attempting to evince a loutish chauvinism, for comedic effect.

One of the following is therefore fact:

1-I failed in my attempt at humor.

2-You have failed to appreciate my attempt at humor.

I have not the slightest idea which of these two is correct.

[j2k4]

Originally posted by DarthInsinuate@9 February 2004 - 14:52
humans are not the only species capable of becoming homosexual, it is known to occur all over the animal kingdom

Fact: The ACLU and NAMBLA are forming up a unified effort to legalize trans-species homosexuality.

Hamsters are reportedly in an uproar over the news.

[DanB]

You mean the J doesn&#39;t stand for Jacqueline?

[bigboab]

Originally posted by j2k4@9 February 2004 - 18:57
I have not the slightest idea which of these two is correct.

Neither of them are &#39;Right&#39;.

[j2k4]

Originally posted by danb@9 February 2004 - 15:02
You mean the J doesn&#39;t stand for Jacqueline?&nbsp;

No.

j stands for jet-propelled.

Sorry.

[j2k4]

Originally posted by bigboab+9 February 2004 - 15:04--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bigboab &#064; 9 February 2004 - 15:04)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-j2k4@9 February 2004 - 18:57
I have not the slightest idea which of these two is correct.

Neither of them are &#39;Right&#39;. [/b][/quote]
Hmmm.

No, Boab-

I think I&#39;ll stick with which is, over which are.

The latter would seem to indicate the possibility that more than one could be correct; as there are only two choices, I think that clarity is sufficient.

Good point, though; the ladies would have insisted I correct my faux pas, had I made one.

[bigboab]

Originally posted by j2k4@9 February 2004 - 19:25
The latter would seem to indicate the possibility that more than one could be correct; as there are only two choices, I think that clarity is sufficient.

Do you mean you would like to know which one is more &#39;right&#39; than the other. This is all rather confusing because both of them are raving loonies.


It is all far too confusing for me as I have not had my dinner yet.

[j2k4]

Originally posted by bigboab@9 February 2004 - 15:35
Do you mean you would like to know which one is more &#39;right&#39; than the other. This is all rather confusing because both of them are raving loonies.


It is all far too confusing for me as I have not had my dinner yet.

And I was so studiously trying to avoid making that same point&#33;

Enjoy your dinner, sir.

I am off to work, now.

[Aaron_T]

very intersting