Is Everything On Kl Fake?

[chev24grd]

Originally posted by junkyardking+7 February 2004 - 01:20--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (junkyardking &#064; 7 February 2004 - 01:20)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SOLIDSNAKEV1@6 February 2004 - 20:39
wouldnt using sig2dat guarentee you getting a REAL download file?

No because it only hashes a small portion of a file, it&#39;s practily useless for error correction, there been alot of reports that some sig2dat links usally mp3&#39;s got corrupted on purpose, this was done with ease because the hashing was inadaquate.

That&#39;s why other protacols such as ed2k and bittorent use sha1 hashing which hashes the whole file making the file nearly uncorruptable as it spreads over the network... [/b][/quote]
So, are you saying that bt and ed2k are better than the verifides or just the search files on KaZaa Lite? Not being smart, I really do want to know your opinion. I really like bt.

[junkyardking]

Originally posted by chev24grd@7 February 2004 - 00:31

So, are you saying that bt and ed2k are better than the verifides or just the search files on KaZaa Lite? Not being smart, I really do want to know your opinion. I really like bt.

Yep you will get fakes/renamed files with all p2p programs but you can get ed2k verifieds from sites like http://ww.sharereactor.com and https://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?showtopic=86867, i find overnet lite the best ed2k client https://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?showtopic=91053

The integratdy of files on networks and things such as bittorent that use sha1 hashing tends to far higher.